O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-7-50 (2019)

Deductions for United States savings bonds

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The disbursing or fiscal officer of any state department, board, bureau, commission, agency, municipality, county, or other political subdivision thereof may deduct from the salary of any employee of this state, county, municipality, or political subdivision thereof such amount as the employee shall authorize in writing for the purchase of United States savings bonds for the employee. The written authorization shall be filed with the disbursing or fiscal officer of such state department, board, bureau, commission, agency, municipality, or county, and he shall make such rules and regulations governing the purchase of the bonds as he may deem necessary, which rules and regulations shall be incorporated in the employee’s written authorization. The authorization of the employee may be withdrawn by the employee at any time upon filing written notice of withdrawal with said disbursing or fiscal officer.

History

(Ga. L. 1950, p. 323, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 51B C.J.S., Labor Relations, §§ 1246, 1247, 1248, 1249.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Mwangi v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 164 F. Supp. 3d 1403 (N.D. Ga. 2016).
Mwangi v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 164 F. Supp. 3d 1403 (N.D. Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× ““[A] landlord-tenant relationship exists between a legal title holder and a tenant at sufferance such that the dispossessory procedures set forth in O.C.G.A § 45-7-50 et seq. are applicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.