O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 46-3-39 (2019)

Restriction on liability of owners and operators of high-voltage lines; effect of part on duty or degree of care

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The owner or operator of high-voltage lines shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high-voltage lines unless notice has been given as required by Code Section 46-3-34 and the owner or operator of the high-voltage line has failed to comply with the provisions of Code Section 46-3-33. (b) Except as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, nothing in this part shall be construed or applied so as to limit or reduce the duty or degree of care applicable to owners or operators of high-voltage lines with respect to damage or loss to person or property.

History

(Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 10; Code 1981, § 46-3-38; Code 1981, § 46-3-39, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2141, § 1.)

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 1992, p. 2141, § 1, redesignated former Code Section 46-3-39 as present Code Section 46-3-40. JUDICIAL DECISIONS This chapter added another theory of liability. - Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 10 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-3-39) means that the chapter has not subtracted a theory of liability but added another, i.e., regardless of any concurring factual negligence on the part of a power company, an employer would be negligent per se vis-a-vis an employer if it vio-

lated a provision of this chapter. Savannah Elec. & Power Co. v. Holton, 127 Ga. App. 447, 193 S.E.2d 866 (1972). Maintenance of wires at minimum height not actionable negligence. - The mere maintenance, without more, of high tension wires at a minimum height of 24 feet four inches above a traveled roadway is not ac-

tionable negligence. Carden v. Georgia Power Co., 231 Ga. 406, 202 S.E.2d 55 (1973). Companies protected by principle of nonliability for utility pole placement. - Power companies as well as telephone companies are protected by the principle of nonliability for utility pole placement in O.C.G.A. § 46-5-1, where such pole is located with approval of local authorities and does not interfere with normal highway use. Georgia Power Co. v. Collum, 176 Ga. App. 61, 334 S.E.2d 922 (1985). Power company not liable. - Power company was protected from an action arising from injuries to an employee who came in contact with a power line, where the employer was aware of the high voltage carried in the line and neither the employer nor employee gave appropriate notice to the company. Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 227 Ga. App. 449, 489 S.E.2d 573 (1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 869, 119 S. Ct. 163, 142 L. Ed. 2d 134 (1998). Power company not liable if notice not given. - Defendant power company could not be held responsible for injuries that occurred during painting of an apartment building, where neither the power company nor the utilities protection center was notified of the work as required by statute. Santana v. Georgia Power Co., 269 Ga. 127, 498 S.E.2d 521 (1998).

Assumption of risk did not apply as a defense to a farm worker’s death by electrocution since there was no evidence to show that the farm worker appreciated the danger of the sagging power lines; despite the fact that the power company failed to maintain or inspect its power lines, it was immune from liability since it had no notice that the deceased was working within 10 feet of its lines. Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 255 Ga. App. 668, 566 S.E.2d 356 (2002), aff ’d, 276 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003). Georgia High-voltage Safety Act, O.C.G.A. § 46-3-30 et seq., barred recovery in a wrongful death action as the decedent failed to give the statutory notice that decedent would be working within 10 feet of a sagging power line with which decedent came into contact and which electrocuted the decedent. Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 276 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003). Cited in Reighard v. Georgia Power Co., 119 Ga. App. 640, 168 S.E.2d 639 (1969); Malvarez v. Georgia Power Co., 250 Ga. 568, 300 S.E.2d 145 (1983), superceded by statute as stated in Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 279 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Duty to guard against danger to children by electric wires, 41 ALR 1337; 49 ALR 1053; 100 ALR 621. Duty of public utility to notify patron in advance of temporary suspension of service, 52 ALR 1078. Liability of electric light or power company for injury or damage due to condition of service lines or electrical appliance maintained by one to whom it furnishes electric current, 134 ALR 507. Liability of electric power or telephone

company for injury or damage by lightning transmitted on wires, 25 ALR2d 722. Liability for injury to or death of child from electric wire encountered while climbing tree, 91 ALR3d 616. Liability for injury or death resulting when object is manually brought into contact with, or close proximity to, electric line, 33 ALR4th 809. Liability for injury or death from collision with guy wire, 8 ALR5th 177.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1996–2008 · leading case: Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 489 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).
Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 489 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 55× “" The High-voltage Safety Act provides a restriction on liability in OCGA § 46-3-39: "(a) The owner or operator of high-voltage lines shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high-voltage lines unless notice has been…”
Williams v. Mitchell Cnty. Elec. Membership Corp., 566 S.E.2d 356 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “” Now, the 1992 Act, § 10 (OCGA § 46-3-39) of Ga. L. 1960, pp. 181,185, severely limited that which formerly read: “[njothing in this Act shall be construed or applied as limiting or reducing the duty or degree of care now applicable to owners .”
Santana v. Georgia Power Co., 498 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 4× “The HVSA requires notice to the utilities protection center before work is commenced near a high-voltage power line. OCGA § 46-3-34 (b).”
Callaway v. Crown Crafts, Inc., 477 S.E.2d 435 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 46-3-39. Moreover, we note that Mrs.”
Whitmire v. Georgia Power Co., 607 S.E.2d 213 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 8× “) It is worth noting that similar language about working within ten feet of a high-voltage line can be found in the limitation-of-liability provision found in OCGA § 46-3-39, which states that "[t]he owner or operator of high-voltage lines shall not be liable for damage or loss…”
Jackson Elec. Membership Corp. v. Smith, 576 S.E.2d 878 (Ga. 2003). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 46-3-39 (a). The owner-operator is immune from liability if notice was not given as required by OCGA § 46-3-34, even if the utility has not de-energized the lines.”
Perry v. Georgia Power Co., 629 S.E.2d 588 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “…25-9-6 (a). 9 OCGA§ 25-9-3 (34). 10 OCGA§ 25-9-7 (a). 11 OCGA§ 25-9-7 (e). 12 OCGA§ 25-9-2. 13 OCGA § 46-3-33. 14 OCGA § 46-3-39 (a).”
Dalton v. 933 Peachtree, L.P., 661 S.E.2d 156 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “[The] 1992 amendment to the HVSA explicitly states that owners and operators of high-voltage lines are not liable unless notice has been given and the owner or operator of the power line has failed to effectively guard against danger by taking the appropriate safety precautions.”
Williams v. Mitchell Cnty. Elec. Membership Corp., 582 S.E.2d 107 (Ga. 2003). · cites it 8× “The jury found that Mitchell’s negligence proximately caused the death, and awarded damages. The trial court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict, holding that the decedent assumed a known risk, and that the failure to provide the notice required by the HVSA insulated…”
Smith v. Jackson Elec. Membership Corp., 560 S.E.2d 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “5 OCGA § 46-3-39 (a); Santana v. Ga. Power Co.”
Brandon Antony Rogers v. State (Tex. App. 2008). “Rather than provide for indemnity, the relevant statute in Georgia excuses a utility from liability altogether. In particular, the statute provides that a utility “shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high voltage…”
AEP Texas North Co., F/K/A West Texas Utils. Co. v. SPA Pipe, Inc. D/B/A Smith Pipe of Abilene & SPA Pipe & Supply, LP (Tex. App. 2008). “Rather than provide for indemnity, the relevant statute in Georgia excuses a utility from liability altogether. In particular, the statute provides that a utility "shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high voltage…”
— 46-3-39(a) — 1 case
Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 489 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “" The High-voltage Safety Act provides a restriction on liability in OCGA § 46-3-39: "(a) The owner or operator of high-voltage lines shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high-voltage lines unless notice has been…”
— 46-3-39(b) — 1 case
Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 489 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “" The High-voltage Safety Act provides a restriction on liability in OCGA § 46-3-39: "(a) The owner or operator of high-voltage lines shall not be liable for damage or loss to person or property resulting from work within ten feet of high-voltage lines unless notice has been…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.