O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 47-12-21 (2019)

Creation of the fund; membership of the board of trustees; payments to the fund

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) There is created the District Attorneys Retirement Fund of Georgia.

(b) The board of trustees of the fund shall be the Governor, the state treasurer, and an appointee of the Governor who is not the Attorney General. All payments to this fund shall be made to the board of trustees.

History

(Ga. L. 1949, p. 780, § 7; Ga. L. 1988, p. 426, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1402, § 15; Ga. L. 2010, p. 863, § 3/SB 296.)

Annotations

The 2010 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, substituted "state treasurer" for "director of the Office of Treasury and Fiscal Services" in the middle of the first sentence of subsection (b).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Special appropriation is not required in connection with this retirement fund. 1948-49 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 489.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 60A Am. Jur. 2d, Pensions and Retirement Funds, § 1166 et seq.

C.J.S. - 70 C.J.S., Pensions, §§ 1 et seq., 5 et seq., 10, 12 et seq., 15, 18.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: State of Ga. v. McMillan, 319 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Ga. v. McMillan, 319 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 1984). · cites it 4× “[4] See also the 1949 Act crating the District Attorneys [Emeritus] Retirement Fund of Georgia, OCGA § 47-12-21 et seq. OCGA § 47-12-81 provides that District Attorneys Emeritus are prohibited from practicing law in any cases against the State of Georgia in any of the courts of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.