O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 51-14-4 (2019)

Prima-facie evidence of physical impairment a prerequisite of asbestos or silica claims

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Prima-facie evidence of physical impairment of the exposed person as defined in paragraph (17) or (18) of Code Section 51-14-3 shall be an essential element of an asbestos claim or silica claim. (b) In order to bring or maintain an asbestos claim or silica claim, the claimant shall submit prima-facie evidence of physical impairment in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.

History

(Code 1981, § 51-14-4, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 4, § 1/SB 182.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s note. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. Ch. 14, T. 51, are included in the annotations for this Code section. Construction. - Superior and state courts did not err in entering nearly identical orders which held that because O.C.G.A. § 51-14-1 et seq. required asbestos plaintiffs to provide proof that exposure to asbestos was a substantial contributing factor in their medical condition, it unconstitutionally affected an employee’s substantive rights by establishing a new

element which did not exist when the original cause of action accrued and, hence, could not be applied retrospectively; moreover, because these requirements and limitations were the heart of the statute, their severance would result in a statute that failed to correspond to the main legislative purpose, or give effect to that purpose. DaimlerChrysler v. Ferrante, 281 Ga. 273, 637 S.E.2d 659 (2006) (decided under former O.C.G.A. Ch. 14, T. 51). Cited in Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga. App. 21, 712 S.E.2d 537 (2011).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2021 · leading case: Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 712 S.E.2d 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011).
Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 712 S.E.2d 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “We do not mean to imply that a plaintiff in an asbestos case must prove that exposure to the product containing asbestos was a “substantial contributing factor” in the development of mesothelioma.”
Pti Royston, LLC v. Shirley Eubank (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “See OCGA §§ 51-14-4 (requiring prima facie evidence of physical impairment); 51-14-6 (requiring the filing of a medical affidavit); and 51-14-9 (setting jurisdiction and venue).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.