O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 51-7-22 (2019)

False imprisonment by several persons

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If false imprisonment is the act of several persons, they may be subject to an action jointly or separately. If jointly, all shall be responsible for the entire recovery.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 2934; Code 1868, § 2941; Code 1873, § 2992; Code 1882, § 2992; Civil Code 1895, § 3853; Civil Code 1910, § 4449; Code 1933, § 105-903.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Since the plaintiff was not guilty of a criminal offense, the plaintiff's arrest without a warrant justified award of damages, against the officer who made the arrest and the persons who procured the officer to do so. Sheppard v. Hale, 58 Ga. App. 140, 197 S.E. 922 (1938).

If action for false imprisonment is one in tort, sureties on defendant sheriffs' bonds are not proper parties to the action and should have been stricken when objection was made. Jackson v. Norton, 75 Ga. App. 650, 44 S.E.2d 269 (1947).

Verdict for separate sums against joint defendants will be set aside and a new trial granted to all of them. McCalla v. Shaw, 72 Ga. 458 (1884).

Cited in Radney v. Levine, 75 Ga. App. 137, 42 S.E.2d 644 (1947); Duchess Chenilles, Inc. v. Masters, 84 Ga. App. 822, 67 S.E.2d 600 (1951); Greenbaum v. Brooks, 110 Ga. App. 661, 139 S.E.2d 432 (1964).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 32 Am. Jur. 2d, False Imprisonment, § 35 et seq.

C.J.S. - 35 C.J.S., False Imprisonment, § 43 et seq.

ALR. - Construction and application of Federal Tort Claims Act provision (28 USCA § 2680(h)) excepting from coverage claims arising out of false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, or abuse of process, 152 A.L.R. Fed. 605.

- - - - - - - - - -

ARTICLE 3 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Cross references. - Abusive litigation, § 51-7-80 et seq.

Law reviews. - For annual survey on law of torts, see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 335 (2009).