O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 6-2-10 (2019)

Requirements as to licensing of pilots

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Since the public safety requires, and the advantages of uniform regulation make it desirable in the interest of aeronautical progress, that a person engaging in navigating or operating aircraft in any form of navigation shall have the qualifications necessary for obtaining and holding a pilot’s license issued by the Federal Aviation Administration, it shall be unlawful for any person to operate or navigate any aircraft unless such person is the holder of an appropriate effective pilot’s license or permit issued by the Federal Aviation Administration; provided, however, that this restriction shall not apply to those persons operating military aircraft of the United States or possessions thereof, or operating public aircraft of any state or territory, or operating any aircraft licensed by a foreign country with which the United States has a reciprocal agreement covering the operation of such licensed aircraft.

History

(Ga. L. 1933, p. 99, § 3; Code 1933, § 11-103.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 8 Am. Jur. 2d, Aviation, § 46 et seq. C.J.S. - 2A C.J.S., Aeronautics and Aerospace, §§ 179 et seq., 203 et seq. ALR. - Aircraft operated wholly

within state as subject to federal regulation, 9 ALR2d 485. Right to enjoin business competitor from unlicensed or otherwise illegal acts or practices, 90 ALR2d 7.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Bodenhamer v. Wooten, 595 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bodenhamer v. Wooten, 595 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). “§ 6-2-10 provides that “[w]hen any person is absent from the state during the period within which an action might have been commenced against him, the time of such absence must not be computed as a portion of the time necessary to create a bar under this chapter.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.