O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 7-4-7 (2019)
[Reserved] No limit on interest rate on loans of $100,000.00 or more
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
History
Code 1933, § 57-119, enacted by Ga. L. 1969, p. 80, §§ 1, 2, 5; repealed by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1146, § 8, effective March 31, 1983.
Annotations
Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1983, p. 1146, § 8 repealed and reserved this Code section, effective March 31, 1983.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1983–1985 · leading case: Mcnair v. Gold Kist, Inc., 305 S.E.2d 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
Mcnair v. Gold Kist, Inc., 305 S.E.2d 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). “iscovery in which the above admitted facts were disclosed by all the parties and both parties having moved for summary judgment with supporting affidavits, stipulations and other evidence, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the amount…”
Kenneth M. Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co., 770 F.2d 1566 (11th Cir. 1985). “§ 57-119 (recodified at Ga.Code Ann. § 7-4-7). 3 . Appellees have been unable to cite us to any authority and we have been unable to locate any authority which suggests that refraining from calling in a demand note constitutes a forbearance to enforce a claim for money.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.