O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-10-53 (2019)

Conduct of proceedings following transfer

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Statute text

After a case has been transferred, all further proceedings shall be conducted as if the case had been originally commenced in the court to which the same was transferred.

History

(Ga. L. 1884-85, p. 35, § 3; Civil Code 1895, § 4958; Civil Code 1910, § 5535; Code 1933, § 3-210.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, "Appellate Practice and Procedure," see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 67 (2011).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Construction with O.C.G.A. § 5-3-34. - Although O.C.G.A. § 9-10-53 addresses the general conduct of further proceedings following a case transfer, O.C.G.A. § 5-3-34(b) sets forth the more specific rule governing the issuance of a certificate of immediate review for interlocutory appeals; thus, the general provisions of O.C.G.A. § 9-10-53 cannot override the clear and specific provisions of O.C.G.A. § 5-6-34(b) mandating that the certificate of immediate review be issued by the trial judge who entered the order in question. Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App. 160, 701 S.E.2d 599 (2010).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 77 Am. Jur. 2d, Venue, §§ 86, 87, 90.

Entitlement to a Stay or Default Judgment Relief Under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act, 35 POF3d 323.

C.J.S. - 92A C.J.S., Venue, § 284 et seq.

ALR. - Power to withdraw or modify order granting change of venue, 59 A.L.R. 362.

Binding effect of order on motion for change of venue, where action is terminated otherwise than on merits and reinstituted, 85 A.L.R.2d 993.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 701 S.E.2d 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).
Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 701 S.E.2d 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 8× “This conclusion is not altered by the statutory provisions of OCGA § 9-10-53 governing the conduct of proceedings following a case transfer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.