§1-10 Effect of repeal on accrued
rights. The repeal of any law shall not affect any act done, or any right
accruing, accrued, acquired, or established, or any suit or proceedings had or
commenced in any civil case, before the time when the repeal takes effect. [CC
1859, §22; RL 1925, §24; RL 1935, §26; RL 1945, §26; RL 1955, §1-13; HRS §1-10]
Rules of Court
Effect of rules of court on pending proceedings, see HRPP
rule 59 and Sup. Ct. order of October 29, 1976.
Attorney General Opinions
New administrative rules superseded old rules as to all
matters except permit applications that were filed before July 1, 1994;
further, on or after July 1, 1994, when statutory authority for old rules
was repealed, the old rules were void and not in effect, the only exception
being with respect to pending permit applications from the period before
July 1, 1994. Att. Gen. Op. 97-4.
Case Notes
A law repealing former divorce laws does not affect pending
suits. 3 H. 304.
Repeal in 1859 of provision for reservation of mineral
rights, effect of. 49 H. 429, 442, 421 P.2d 570.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases, 1948–2016 · leading case:
Mount v. Apao., 384 P.3d 1268 (Haw. 2016).
Mount v. Apao., 384 P.3d 1268 (Haw. 2016).
· cites it 4× “Pursuant to HRS § 1-10 (2009), "[t]he repeal of any law shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing, accrued, acquired, or established, or any suit or proceedings had or commenced in any civil case, before the time when the repeal takes effect.”
Hawaii Elec. Light Co. v. Dep't of Land & Nat. Resources, 75 P.3d 160 (Haw. 2003).
· cites it 4× “HRS § 1-10 (1993), however, governs the effect of repeal on accrued rights and states: The repeal of any law shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing, accrued, acquired, or established, or any suit or proceedings had or commenced in any civil case, before tire time…”
Dannenberg v. State, 383 P.3d 1177 (Haw. 2016).
“Laws Act 88, §§ 1-10 at 138-62. The Health Fund was replaced with the EUTF, through the passage of Act 88, which is now codified as HRS Chapter 87A.”
Graham Constr. Supply, Inc. v. Schrader Constr., Inc., 632 P.2d 649 (Haw. 1981).
· cites it 2× “6 HRS § 1-10, a general saving statute, reads: The repeal of any law shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing, accrued, acquired, or established, or any suit or proceedings had or commenced in any civil case, before the time when the repeal takes effect.”
In the Matter of Eve M. Carlson, 38 Haw. 9 (Haw. 1948).
“140, §§ 1-10), but raises no question of constitutionality with respect to the enactment’s requirement that persons acting as real estate brokers and salesmen be licensed.”
Althouse v. State, 137 P.3d 349 (Haw. 2006).
“In particular, Althouse's notice of appeal does not identify the court’s "Order Denying Petitioner's Motion For Stay Of New Minimum Term Hearing Pending Appeal Of Court’s Decision”'as a basis from which his second point of error is derived.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.