Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 11
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-24 (2026)

  Closing register

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §11-24  Closing register.  (a)  At 4:30 p.m. on the tenth day before each election, but if the day is a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday then at 4:30 p.m. on the first working day immediately thereafter, the general county register shall be closed to registration for persons seeking to vote and remain closed to registration until after the election, subject to change only as provided in sections 11-15.2, 11-21(c), 11-22, 11-25, 11-26, and this section.

     (b)  Notwithstanding the time of closing the general county registrar under subsection (a), the clerk may accept an application submitted on the tenth day if it was received electronically through the online voter registration system in accordance with section 11-15.3 or received as part of a driver's licensing transaction or from another designated voter registration agency under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.  The clerk shall also accept an application that is postmarked before or on the tenth day before the election. [L 1970, c 26, pt of §2; am L 1973, c 217, §1(1); am L 1976, c 106, §1(6); am L 1977, c 189, §1(3); am L 1979, c 139, §3; am L 1990, c 156, §7; am L 1992, c 129, §5; am L 2012, c 225, §4; am L 2021, c 213, §11]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: North Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP v. McCrory, 997 F. Supp. 2d 322 (M.D.N.C. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
North Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP v. McCrory, 997 F. Supp. 2d 322 (M.D.N.C. 2014). “§ 21-2-224(a) (29 days); Haw. Rev.Stat. § 11-24(a) (30 days); 10 Ill.”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-24(a): 1 case
North Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP v. McCrory, 997 F. Supp. 2d 322 (M.D.N.C. 2014). “§ 21-2-224(a) (29 days); Haw. Rev.Stat. § 11-24(a) (30 days); 10 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.