Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-358 (2026)

§ 11-358

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     11-358]  Contributions to noncandidate committees; limits.  No person shall make contributions to a noncandidate committee in an aggregate amount greater than $1,000 in an election.  This section shall not apply to ballot issue committees. [L 2010, c 211, pt of §2]

 

Case Notes

 

  Contribution limit in this section is unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs' proposed contributions to an entity that engages in solely independent expenditures in excess of the statutory limit; plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction granted.  744 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (2010).

  Plaintiffs, who sought a declaration stating that this section was facially unconstitutional at the preliminary injunction stage, would not likely succeed on the merits; this section's limitation appears to be valid as applied to contributions to a noncandidate committee that does not engage solely in independent expenditures; plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction denied as to this issue.  744 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (2010).

  Plaintiff donors to political action committee had standing to challenge this section; they desired to and eventually made contributions that exceeded the statutory limitations, giving rise to an actual controversy; further, if this section was constitutional as applied, they could have been subject to administrative fines or criminal prosecution; moreover, they indicated a legitimate desire to make similar contributions in 2012, and thus a favorable ruling would have allowed them to make further contributions in 2012 without violating the law.  872 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (2012).

  This section limits the amount of contributions a person can make to a noncandidate committee ("committee"); if the committee makes only independent expenditures, then pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United, Hawaii cannot limit those expenditures; plaintiff donors' contributions to a committee could only lead to independent expenditures; therefore, this section was unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs' contributions to a committee and defendant campaign spending commission was permanently enjoined from enforcing this section's contribution limitation in that situation.  872 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (2012).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Yamada v. Weaver, 872 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (D. Haw. 2012).
Yamada v. Weaver, 872 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (D. Haw. 2012). · cites it 32× “ORDER (1) PERMANENTLY ENJOINING DEFENDANTS FROM ENFORCING HRS § 11-358 AS-APPLIED TO SPECIFIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO AFA-PAC, A COMMITTEE MAKING ONLY INDEPENDENT CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES: AND (2) UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY, AS CHALLENGED, OF PROVISIONS OF HRS §§ 11-302, 355 & 391 J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.