Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 113
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 113-4 (2026)

]  Proceeding by owner

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§113-4]  Proceeding by owner.  Where an inverse condemnation proceeding is instituted by the owner of any right, title or interest in real property because of use of the owner's property in any program or project in which federal or federal-aid funds are used, the court, rendering a judgment for the plaintiff in such proceeding and awarding compensation for the taking of property, or the State's attorney effecting a settlement of any such proceeding, shall determine and award or allow to such plaintiff, as a part of such judgment or settlement, such sums as will, in the opinion of the court or the State's attorney, reimburse such plaintiff for the plaintiff's reasonable costs, disbursements and expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal and engineering fees, actually incurred because of such proceeding. [L 1971, c 32, §4; gen ch 1985]

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. State. ICA Opinion, filed 03/18/2024 [ada], 154 Haw. 144. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/14/2024. S.Ct Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 08/12/2024 [ada]. ICA Order of Corr., filed 11/04/2024 [ada]. (Haw. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. State. ICA Opinion, filed 03/18/2024 [ada], 154 Haw. 144. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 06/14/2024. S.Ct Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 08/12/2024 [ada]. ICA Order of Corr., filed 11/04/2024 [ada]. (Haw. 2025). · cites it 18× “Section 4 of Act 32, codified as HRS § 113-4 (2012), allows inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover “reasonable costs, disbursements and expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal and engineering fees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.