Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 147
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 147-7 (2026)

  Inspection and classification of agricultural commodities; fees

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §147-7  Inspection and classification of agricultural commodities; fees.  (a)  The department may contract with the United States Department of Agriculture for obtaining the services of a supervising inspector employed by the federal department and the establishment of a cooperative inspection service with the United States government.  The department, or the supervising inspector with the approval of the department, may designate any competent employee or agent of the department as an inspector to inspect or classify agricultural commodities in accordance with rules of the department, and at the time and places designated by the supervising inspector or the department.

     (b)  The inspectors shall be authorized to inspect or classify agricultural commodities at the request of persons having a financial interest in the commodities and to ascertain and certify to the persons the grade, classification, quality, condition, or origin of them and other pertinent facts.

     (c)  The department may fix, assess, and collect or cause to be collected fees for the services when they are performed by employees of the department.  The fees shall be on a uniform basis and in an amount reasonably necessary to cover the cost of inspection and the administration of this part; provided that the department may prescribe a reasonable charge for traveling expenses and extraordinary services when the performance of the services involves unusual cost in their performance.  No fee shall be charged for an inspection unless the inspection was requested by a person having a financial interest in the inspected commodity.

     (d)  The department may adopt rules establishing the requirements, procedures, restrictions, and other criteria necessary for establishing a program of self inspection and certification of agricultural commodities. [L 1945, c 252, §7; RL 1955, §22-6; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §22; am L 1961, c 132, §2; HRS §147-7; am L 1978, c 12, §1; am L Sp 1995, c 8, §2; am L 1997, c 345, §2; am L 2012, c 328, §4]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: State v. Frazer, 375 P.3d 267 (Haw. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Frazer, 375 P.3d 267 (Haw. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “In his brief, Frazer states that "[t]he Ritte court concluded that defendant Ritte’s DAG status at the time [he allegedly possessed the firearms and ammunition] rendered him 'under indictment’ for HRS § 147-7(b) purposes." (Footnote omitted.”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 147-7(b): 1 case
State v. Frazer, 375 P.3d 267 (Haw. App. 2016). “In his brief, Frazer states that "[t]he Ritte court concluded that defendant Ritte’s DAG status at the time [he allegedly possessed the firearms and ammunition] rendered him 'under indictment’ for HRS § 147-7(b) purposes." (Footnote omitted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.