Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 231-4 (2026)

  Assessing officers eligible to appointment as collecting officers and vice versa

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §231-4  Assessing officers eligible to appointment as collecting officers and vice versa.  Appointees to offices or positions in the department of taxation for the assessing of taxes shall be eligible for appointment to offices or positions in the department for the collection of taxes, and vice versa. [L 1932 2d, c 40, §6; RL 1935, §1904; RL 1945, §5106; am L 1951, c 264, §2; RL 1955, §115-6; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §16; HRS §231-4; am L 1989, c 14, §4(3)]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1961–1965 · leading case: State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co., 397 P.2d 593 (Haw. 1964).
State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co., 397 P.2d 593 (Haw. 1964). · cites it 11× “1955, § 231-4, 5 and contend that its provisions are mandatory and self-executing with the trial, court automatically losing jurisdiction of the subject matter.”
Kudlich v. Ciciarelli, 401 P.2d 449 (Haw. 1965). · cites it 7× “1955, § 231-4. After this further hearing, the court ruled that the statute did apply, and entered an order dismissing the case with prejudice on November 1, 1962.”
Arnold v. City of Honolulu, 363 P.2d 968 (Haw. 1961). · cites it 6× “1955, § 231-4 and rule H.R.C.P., Rule 41(b), to dismiss this ac-.”
State ex rel. Di Tullio v. Jamieson, 401 P.2d 456 (Haw. 1965). · cites it 6× “1955, § 231-4. 1 On January 14, 1963, the case was called in the Third Division of the Circuit Court, Honorable Ronald B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.