Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 281-52 (2026)

  Public hearing

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §281-52  Public hearing.  No license shall be granted except after a public hearing by the liquor commission upon notice as prescribed in this chapter; provided that sections 281-57 to 281-60 shall not apply to the holder of a restaurant general license, a wholesale general license, a retail general license, or a dispenser's general license, who applies for a different kind of license within the class of the holder's existing license, on the same premises, or to the holder of a cabaret license who applies for a dispenser license of any kind, on the same premises, or to the holder of a dispenser's beer and wine license who applies for dispenser's beer license, on the same premises, or to a licensee whose licensed premises have been demolished and replaced by another building on the same premises and who applies for the same or lesser kind of the same class of liquor license previously held by the licensee on said premises. [L Sp 1933, c 40, §28; RL 1935, §2597; am L 1939, c 205, pt of §1; RL 1945, §7249; RL 1955, §159-51; am L 1967, c 62, §1; HRS §281-52; am L 1969, c 197, §1; am L 1972, c 149, §1; gen ch 1985; am L 2008, c 168, §10]

 

Case Notes

 

  Where a public hearing pertaining to the issuance of a liquor license was statutorily required under §281-57 and this section, and petitioner's legal rights, duties, and privileges were determined based on the public hearing regarding the decision to grant or deny a liquor license to petitioner, the public hearing was a "contested case" hearing governed by chapter 91; thus, (1) petitioner was entitled to judicial review under §91-14, (2) §91-11 applied to proceedings on petitioner's application for liquor license, and (3) the liquor commission did not comply with §91-11.  118 H. 320, 189 P.3d 432 (2008).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Comm'n of Honolulu, 189 P.3d 432 (Haw. 2008).
E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Comm'n of Honolulu, 189 P.3d 432 (Haw. 2008). · cites it 22× “11 *325 The court ruled that the public hearing required pursuant to HRS § 281-52 (1993) was a contested case hearing and that “the Commission was required to comply with the contested case procedures” in HRS chapter 91, but that the Commission “did not comply with HRS § 91-11.”
E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Comm'n of Honolulu, 174 P.3d 367 (Haw. App. 2007). · cites it 24× “2006); [17] (10) The Commission holds a public hearing pursuant to HRS §§ 281-52 (1993) [18] and 281-57(b) to consider the application and any protests or objections to the application, hear the parties in interest, accept written or oral testimony for or against the…”
Sierra Club v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources. Dissenting Opinion by Nakasone, J. Consol. with CAAP-22-0000519. (Haw. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “E&J Lounge concerned a liquor license application; a contested case was required by statute — HRS §§ 281-52 and 281-57. 118 Hawai#i at 349-50, 189 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.