Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 352-9 (2026)

9

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§352-9 Period committed. (a) All persons committed to the Hawaii youth correctional facilities shall be committed for the period of their minority or as otherwise ordered by the court. Such persons may be placed on furlough or parole if deemed appropriate. The power to discharge a person committed to a youth correctional facility is reserved to the director; provided that the director shall give a thirty-day notice of such intended discharge to the appropriate court and to the prosecutor's office of the appropriate county. Prior court approval for furlough, parole, or discharge of all minors, committed by the family court to a youth correctional facility for the period of their minority or otherwise, shall be obtained when such is specifically required in the commitment order. In any case, no person nineteen years or older shall be incarcerated in a youth correctional facility.

(b) In those cases where the term of commitment to a youth correctional facility extends beyond the person's nineteenth birthday, the person shall be placed on juvenile parole pursuant to the original family court order for the balance of the person's term of commitment; provided that such term does not extend beyond the person's twentieth birthday unless earlier terminated. [L 1980, c 303, pt of §8(1); am L 1990, c 92, §1; am L 1997, c 325, §1; am L 1998, c 190, §1]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1979–2013 · leading case: Lee v. Corregedore, 925 P.2d 324 (Haw. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lee v. Corregedore, 925 P.2d 324 (Haw. 1996). · cites it 4× “HRS § 352-9 (1976); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(4).”

Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Dep't of Educ., 58 P.3d 545 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 2× “HRS § 352-9 (1976); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(4).”

Figueroa v. State, 604 P.2d 1198 (Haw. 1979). · cites it 2× “HRS § 352-9 (1976); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(4).”

In the Interest of Doe, 950 P.2d 701 (Haw. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “Neither does HRS § 352-9 (1993) or § 571-13 (1993). They state as follows: § 352-9 Period committed, (a) All persons committed to the [Hawai'i] youth correctional facilities shall be committed for the period of their minority or as otherwise ordered by the court.”

Figueroa v. State, 604 P.2d 1198 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 2× “HRS § 352-9 (1976); see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(4).”

Dettling v. United States, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (D. Haw. 2013). · cites it 2× “(quoting Haw.Rev.Stat. § 352-9). Plaintiffs appear to argue that Proclamation 8031 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act similarly gave rise to a duty of care on the part of NOAA in its implementation of the fishery restrictions and compensation scheme.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.