Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 368-15 (2026)

  Compliance review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §368-15  Compliance review.  At any time in its discretion but not later than one year from the date of a conciliation agreement, predetermination settlement, or after the date of a commission's order to cease an unlawful practice and to take appropriate remedy, the commission shall investigate whether the terms of the agreement, settlement, or order are being complied with by the respondent.  Upon a finding that the terms of the agreement, settlement, or the terms of the commission's order, are not being complied with by the respondent, the commission shall take affirmative action as authorized in section 368-3. [L 1989, c 386, pt of §1; am L 1991, c 252, §6]

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Hawai'i Tech. Academy v. LE. (Haw. 2017).
Hawai'i Tech. Academy v. LE. (Haw. 2017). · cites it 2× “Act 386 also created “Remedies” for the HCRC (now Part II of Chapter 368), including HRS § 368-11 (Complaint against unlawful discrimination); HRS § 368-12 (Notice of right to sue); HRS § 368-13 (Investigation and conciliation of complaint); HRS § 368-14 (Commission hearings);…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.