Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 372-4 (2026)

State apprenticeship

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§372-4 State apprenticeship council. The director shall establish within the department the state apprenticeship council which shall serve in an advisory capacity to the director on matters within the jurisdiction of the department relating to apprenticeship programs. The membership and organization of the council shall be determined by the director. The council shall be composed of persons familiar with apprenticeable occupations, and shall include an equal number of representatives of employers and employee organizations, and shall include public members who shall not number in excess of the number named to represent either employers or employee organizations. The members of the council shall be appointed and removed at the pleasure of the director. [L Sp 1941, c 23, pt of §1; RL 1945, §4141; RL 1955, §89-4; am L 1967, c 20, §1(c); HRS §372-4; gen ch 1985; am L 2012, c 14, §5]

Case Notes

A contested case hearing pursuant to §91-14(a) was not required in the determination by the labor director to register an apprenticeship program pursuant to this section. 104 H. 275, 88 P.3d 647 (2004).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2006 · leading case: Int'l Bhd. of Painters & Allied Trades, Drywall Tapers, Finishers & Allied Workers Local Union 1944 v. Befitel, 88 P.3d 647 (Haw. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Int'l Bhd. of Painters & Allied Trades, Drywall Tapers, Finishers & Allied Workers Local Union 1944 v. Befitel, 88 P.3d 647 (Haw. 2004). · cites it 16× “We hold that a contested ease hearing pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 91-14(a) (1993) was not required in the determination by Appellee-appellant Director (Director) of the Appellee-appellant Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DLIR) (collectively…”

Aha Hui Malama O Kaniakapupu v. Land Use Comm'n, 139 P.3d 712 (Haw. 2006). · cites it 2× “In International Brotherhood, this court held that the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction inasmuch as a contested case hearing was not required in the determination by the director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DLIR) to register an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.