Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 380-14 (2026)

Proceedings arising under employment relations act; court jurisdiction over

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§380-14 Proceedings arising under employment relations act; court jurisdiction over. (a) When granting appropriate temporary relief or a restraining order, or making and entering a decree enforcing, modifying, and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in whole or in part an order of the Hawaii labor relations board, as provided in this section, the jurisdiction of courts sitting in equity shall not be limited by this chapter.

(b) The board shall have power, upon the filing of a complaint as provided in section 377-9 to petition any circuit court of the State within any circuit wherein the unfair labor practice in question is alleged to have occurred or wherein the person resides or transacts business, for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order. Upon the filing of any such petition the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the person, and thereupon shall have jurisdiction to grant to the board such temporary relief or restraining order as it deems just and proper.

(c) Whenever it is charged that any person has engaged in an unfair labor practice within the meaning of section 377-7(5), (6), (7), (8), and (9), the preliminary investigation of that charge shall be made forthwith and given priority over all other cases except cases of like character in the office where it is filed or to which it is referred. If, after the investigation, the board has reasonable cause to believe the charge is true, it shall petition any circuit court of the State within any circuit where the unfair labor practice in question has occurred, is alleged to have occurred, or wherein the person resides or transacts business, for appropriate injunctive relief pending the final adjudication of the board with respect to that matter. Upon the filing of any such petition, the circuit court shall have jurisdiction to grant such injunctive relief or temporary restraining order as it deems just and proper, notwithstanding any other provision of law or rule of court; provided that no temporary restraining order shall be issued without notice unless a petition alleges that substantial and irreparable injury to the charging party will be unavoidable and the temporary restraining order shall be effective for no longer than five days and will become void at the expiration of that period; provided further that the board shall not apply for any restraining order under section 377-7(5), (6), (7), (8), and (9) if a charge against the employer under section 377-6(2) has been filed and after the preliminary investigation, the board has reasonable cause to believe that the charge is true and that a complaint should be issued. Upon the filing of any such petition, the courts shall cause notice thereof to be served upon any person involved in the charge and the person, including the charging party, shall be given an opportunity to appear by counsel and present any relevant testimony; provided that for the purposes of this subsection, circuit courts shall be deemed to have jurisdiction of a labor organization in:

(1) The circuit in which the organization maintains its principal office; or

(2) Any circuit in which the organization's duly authorized officers or agents are engaged in promoting or protecting the interests of employee members. The service of legal process upon an officer or agent shall constitute service upon the labor organization and make the organization a party to the suit. [L 1963, c 200, §14; Supp, §90B-14; HRS §380-14; am L 1973, c 31, §9; am L 1985, c 251, §26; am L 2016, c 55, §7]

Rules of Court

Injunctions, see HRCP rule 65.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1973–2018 · leading case: Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 14× “17 (referring to HRS § 380-14). HRS § 380-14(b) (1993) provides, in part, that "the [HLRB] shall have power, upon the filing of a complaint .”

Gov't Employees Ass'n v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 14× “17 (referring to HRS § 380-14). HRS § 380-14(b) (1993) provides, in part, that "the [HLRB] shall have power, upon the filing of a complaint .”

Hawaii Pub. Emp. Relations Bd. v. Hawaii State Teachers Ass'n, 511 P.2d 1080 (Haw. 1973). · cites it 2× “Appellant then says that once appellee, after the hearing, issues an order with regard to prohibited practices, then appellee may proceed to circuit court to enforce its order as provided by HRS § 380-14. Appellee claims that its request for injunctive relief is not based on…”

Haw. Health Sys. Corp. v. United Pub. Workers, 415 P.3d 937 (Haw. App. 2018). · cites it 7× “We also note that certain types of cases listed in HRS § 380-14 (2015 & Supp. 2017) 10 are exempt from the requirements of HRS chapter 380.”

— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 380-14(b) — 2 cases

Hawaii Gov't Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). “17 (referring to HRS § 380-14). HRS § 380-14(b) (1993) provides, in part, that "the [HLRB] shall have power, upon the filing of a complaint .”

Gov't Employees Ass'n v. Lingle, 239 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2010). “17 (referring to HRS § 380-14). HRS § 380-14(b) (1993) provides, in part, that "the [HLRB] shall have power, upon the filing of a complaint .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.