§386-23 Services of attendant. When
the director of labor and industrial relations finds that the service of an
attendant for the injured employee is constantly necessary the director may
award a monthly sum of not more than the product of four times the effective
maximum weekly benefit rate prescribed in section 386-31, as the director may
deem necessary, for the procurement of such service. Payment for the services
of an attendant shall be the liability of the employer, but shall be subject to
the deductible under section 386-100. [L 1963, c 116, pt of §1; Supp, §97-22;
HRS §386-23; am L 1971, c 25, §1; am L 1976, c 17, §1; am L 1985, c 296, §17;
gen ch 1985]
Case Notes
Section allows compensation
for attendant care services so long as claimants can establish their inability
to function or perform activities of daily living on a consistent basis. 83 H.
361, 926 P.2d 1284 (1996).
Notes of Decisions
Shipley v. Ala Moana Hotel, 926 P.2d 1284 (Haw. 1996).
· cites it 22× “On appeal, Claimant contends that: (1) her attendant care services are “constantly necessary” and payable under HRS § 386-23; and (2) the LIRAB abused its discretion in ordering reimbursement.”
Tam v. Kaiser Permanente, 17 P.3d 219 (Haw. 2001).
“The cost of conducting the medical examina *490 tion shall be limited to the complex consultation charges governed by the medical fee schedule established pursuant to section 386-23(c). 1995 Haw. Sess. L. Act 234, § 13 at 613.”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-23(c): 1 case
Tam v. Kaiser Permanente, 17 P.3d 219 (Haw. 2001).
“The cost of conducting the medical examina *490 tion shall be limited to the complex consultation charges governed by the medical fee schedule established pursuant to section 386-23(c). 1995 Haw. Sess. L. Act 234, § 13 at 613.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.