§572-28 Suits by and against. A
married person may sue and be sued in the same manner as if the person were
sole. This section shall be construed to authorize tort suits between spouses.
[L 1888, c 11, §5; RL 1925, §2998; RL 1935, §4649; RL 1945, §12370; RL 1955,
§325-5; HRS §573-5; ren and am L 1987, c 46, pt of §2; am L 1993, c 70, §2]
Cross References
Torts, who may sue and for what, see §663-1.
Law Journals and Reviews
Empowering Battered Women: Changes in Domestic Violence Laws
in Hawai`i. 17 UH L. Rev. 575 (1995).
Interspousal Torts: A Procedural Framework for Hawai`i. 19 UH L. Rev. 377 (1997).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1992–1998 · leading case:
Epp v. Epp, 905 P.2d 54 (Haw. App. 1995).
Epp v. Epp, 905 P.2d 54 (Haw. App. 1995).
· cites it 4× “It does not permit a marital partner to unilaterally terminate marital agreements.”
Salviejo v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 958 P.2d 552 (Haw. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Sess. L. Act 70, § 2, at 87. The legislative history demonstrates that the amendment was intended "to more fairly and equitably protect married persons[,]” in part by removing the in-terspousal immunity prohibition against suits between spouses "even when such a suit is desired…”
Allstate Ins. v. Wyman, 807 F. Supp. 98 (D. Haw. 1992).
· cites it 2× “Haw. Rev.Stat. § 572-28 (1987). However, Concepcion made a negligent entrustment claim against Heavey.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.