Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 658A
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 658A-29 (2026)

] Relationship to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§658A-29]  Relationship to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act.  The provisions of this chapter governing the legal effect, validity, and enforceability of electronic records or electronic signatures, and of contracts performed with the use of such records or signatures conform to the requirements of section 102 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, Public Law 106-229. [L 2001, c 265, pt of §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Nordic PCL Constr., Inc. v. LPIHGC, LLC. ICA Order Dismissing Appeal by Hiraoka, J., filed 09/30/2024 [ada], 156 Haw. 16. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 11/29/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/09/2025 [ada]., 574 P.3d 1273 (Haw. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nordic PCL Constr., Inc. v. LPIHGC, LLC. ICA Order Dismissing Appeal by Hiraoka, J., filed 09/30/2024 [ada], 156 Haw. 16. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 11/29/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/09/2025 [ada]., 574 P.3d 1273 (Haw. 2025). · cites it 2× “By providing for appeals only from those orders vacating arbitration awards that do not direct a rehearing, [language identical to HRS § 658A-29(a)(5)] implicitly bars appeals from orders that direct a rehearing.”
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 658A-29(a)(5): 1 case
Nordic PCL Constr., Inc. v. LPIHGC, LLC. ICA Order Dismissing Appeal by Hiraoka, J., filed 09/30/2024 [ada], 156 Haw. 16. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 11/29/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/09/2025 [ada]., 574 P.3d 1273 (Haw. 2025). “By providing for appeals only from those orders vacating arbitration awards that do not direct a rehearing, [language identical to HRS § 658A-29(a)(5)] implicitly bars appeals from orders that direct a rehearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.