Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 8
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 8-24 (2025)

§ 8-24

✓ laws through the 2025 session: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§8-24  `Ōlelo Hawai`i Month.]  (a)  Mahina `Ōlelo Hawai`i.  E `ike mau a e kapa `ia ana ae ka mahina `o Pepeluali `o ia ka "Mahina `Ōlelo Hawai`i" i mea e ho`omaika`i a e paipai aku ai i ka `ōlelo `ana o ua `ōlelo makuahine nei la.  `A`ole e kū ana kēia mahina i kapa `ia ka "Mahina `Ōlelo Hawai`i" i lānui o ka moku`āina o Hawai`i.

     (b)  `Ōlelo Hawai`i Month.  The month of February shall be known and designated as "`Ōlelo Hawai`i Month" to celebrate and encourage the use of Hawaiian language.  This month is not and shall not be construed as a state holiday. [L 2013, c 28, §2]

 

Revision Note

 

  The two new sections enacted were redesignated as subsections (a) and (b) pursuant to §23G-15.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1958–1966 · leading case: City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. Kam, 402 P.2d 683 (Haw. 1965).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. Kam, 402 P.2d 683 (Haw. 1965). “1955, § 8-24. The appeal, which took the form of an application for and the obtaining of a writ of error under R.”
Akana v. Damon, 42 Haw. 415 (1958). “1955, § 8-24, provides: “When all payments required by the final judg *429 ment have been made, the court shall make a final order of condemnation, which shall describe the property condemned and the purposes of such condemnation, a certified copy of which shall be filed and…”
City & Cnty. of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co., 421 P.2d 300 (Haw. 1966). “The intervenors state: “It should be mentioned here that the situation is entirely different than the one where the Plaintiff may be acquiring property for public use but for one reason or another is not yet prepared to put it to its public use at the time of the vesting [under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.