Probate, police and justice of the peace courts abolished — Transfer of jurisdiction.
All probate courts, justice of the peace courts, and police courts shall cease to exist on the date as provided in this act. Wherever the words probate court, justice court or police court appear in the Idaho Code they shall mean the district court, or the magistrate’s division of the district court, as the case may be, and any power, duty, responsibility, function or jurisdiction of the probate court, justice court or police court shall be transferred to the district court or the magistrate’s division of the district court, as the case may be. Wherever the words judge, probate judge, justice of the peace or police judge appear in the Idaho Code they shall mean the district judge or the magistrate of the district court, as the case may be, and any power, duty, responsibility, function or jurisdiction of the probate judge, justice of the peace, or police judge shall be transferred to the district judge or the magistrate of the district court, as the case may be.
Notes of Decisions
City of Boise v. Ada Cnty., 215 P.3d 514 (Idaho 2009).
· cites it 2× “See I.C. § 1-103. Under the restructured court system, counties are responsible for providing quarters, facilities, equipment, staff, and supplies for the magistrate’s division.”
State v. Griffith, 539 P.2d 604 (Idaho 1975).
· cites it 4× “Appellant argues that I.C. §§ 1-103 and 1-105, Rule 27 of the Rules of the Court for the Magistrate’s Division of the District Court, 13 and portions of the Criminal Appellate Rules unconstitutionally deny his right to a jury trial.”
Hayes v. Gardner, 504 P.2d 810 (Idaho 1972).
· cites it 6× “§ 16-1802(a)), I.C. § 1-103 now provides that wherever the term “probate court” appears in the Idaho Code, it shall mean “the district court or the magistrate’s division of the district court, as the case may he.”
Olson v. Kirkham, 720 P.2d 217 (Idaho Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “I.C. § 1-103. Kirkham argues that subject matter jurisdiction is vested in the magistrate division exclusively by virtue of I.”
Hergert v. Bank of the West (In Re Hergert), 275 B.R. 58 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2002).
· cites it 2× “See Section 1-103. Id. 9 Third, revised I.C. § 28-9-511 indicates that the secured party identified in the *67 financing statement is the “secured party of record” and will remain such until the situation is altered by amendment.”
Ada Cnty. v. City of Garden City Ex Rel. Garden City Council, 318 P.3d 904 (Idaho 2014).
· cites it 2× “344-95; I.C. § 1-103; and I.C. § 1-2201). The reform required each county to provide “quarters for the magistrate’s division of the district court, including the facilities and equipment necessary to make the space provided functional for its intended use, and [to] provide for…”
Glasco v. Brassard, 483 P.2d 924 (Idaho 1971).
· cites it 2× “…court was eliminated and jurisdiction in this type of ease placed in the district court. S.L.1969, Ch. 100, § 1. I.C. § 1-103.”
Fernandez v. W. Rail Road Builders, Inc., 736 P.2d 1361 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “See generally Summers, General Equitable Principles Under Section 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 72 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.