Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 18-3306 (2026)

Injuring another by discharge of aimed firearms. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Injuring another by discharge of aimed firearms. 

Any person who shall maim or injure any other person by the discharge of any firearm pointed or aimed, intentionally but without malice, at any such person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one (1) year; and if death ensue from such wounding or maiming, such person so offending shall be deemed guilty of the crime of manslaughter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–2014 · leading case: State v. Warden, 592 P.2d 836 (Idaho 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Warden, 592 P.2d 836 (Idaho 1979). · cites it 12× “I.C. §§ 18-3306 and 3312 deal with the injury of a person by use of firearms where, respectively, the discharged firearm was pointed or aimed intentionally, but without malice, and where the injury was occasioned by the handling or use of the firearm in a careless, reckless or…”
State v. Trejo, 979 P.2d 1230 (Idaho Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “See I.C. § 18-3306. 5 Because of this, the district court also gave the jury an “acquittal first” instruction as required by I.”
State v. Silcox, 650 P.2d 625 (Idaho 1982). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 18-3306. From the entry of judgment of conviction, the defendant perfected the instant appeal.”
State v. Jeremy Joseph Brown (Idaho Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “Finally, Brown argued that he was denied due process of law when he was charged with aggravated battery instead of the intentional, but not malicious, pointing of a firearm that causes maiming or injury under I.C. § 18-3306. That statute contains the word “shall,” and Brown…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.