Recording verdict.
When the verdict given is such as the court may receive, the clerk must immediately record it in full upon the minutes, read it to the jury, and inquire of them whether it is their verdict. If any juror disagree, the fact must be entered upon the minutes and the jury again sent out; but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete, and the jury must be discharged from the case.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2004–2012 · leading case:
State v. Sulez, 108 P.3d 400 (Idaho Ct. App. 2004).
State v. Sulez, 108 P.3d 400 (Idaho Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “” Section 19-2317 likewise provides that if any juror expresses disagreement with the verdict, the jury must again be sent out, but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete and the jury must be discharged.”
Kirk Julliard Gosch v. State (Idaho Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “We conclude that the district court erred in determining that Gosch’s case is distinguishable from Beasley such that Beasely does not apply in this case because Gosch requested that his counsel “appeal everything” after the jury rendered its verdict as opposed to after…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.