Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 19-2501 (2026)

Time for judgment. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Time for judgment. 

After a plea or verdict of guilty, or after a verdict against the defendant on the plea of a former conviction or acquittal, if the judgment be not arrested or a new trial granted, the court must appoint a time for pronouncing judgment, which, in cases of felony, must be at least two days after the verdict, if the court intend to remain in session so long; but if not, then at as remote a time as can reasonably be allowed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1937–2015 · leading case: State v. Carpenter, 176 P.2d 910 (Idaho 1947).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Carpenter, 176 P.2d 910 (Idaho 1947). · cites it 17× “At the time fixed for the pronouncement of sentence, appellant, through her attorney, applied to the court for leniency under Section 19-2501, I.C.A-, as amended by the 1943 S.”
State v. Witzel, 312 P.2d 1044 (Idaho 1957). · cites it 20× “" Prior to 1943, Section 19-2501, I.C.A. [now Section 19-2601, I.”
State v. Yockey, 66 P.2d 111 (Idaho 1937). · cites it 31× “, section 19-2501. Witnesses were examined and their testimony, as well as all the proceedings, were taken by the court reporter and subsequently transcribed.”
State v. Ogata, 508 P.2d 141 (Idaho 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 19-2501] * * * the theory of the criminal law (is) not to seek vengeance against the wrongdoer, but, abstractly, to deter others from the commission of crime.”
State v. Knight, 681 P.2d 6 (Idaho Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 19-2501. In Vigil v. State, supra, the Wyoming Supreme Court stated: The final judgment in a criminal case means sentence.”
State v. Scott Alan Moore, 354 P.3d 505 (Idaho Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 19-2501; but see Idaho Criminal Rule 33 (a court rule directing that the court pronounce judgment).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.