Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 19-2901 (2026)

short title. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

short title. 

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Idaho Bail Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1964–2013 · leading case: Franklin v. State, 392 P.2d 552 (Idaho 1964).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Franklin v. State, 392 P.2d 552 (Idaho 1964). · cites it 4× “* *" Moreover, the very terms of I.C. § 19-2901 require liberality in this area.”
Leader v. Reiner, 151 P.3d 831 (Idaho 2007). · cites it 4× “The Appellant asks us to rule that the Bail Bond Guidelines are invalid because they conflict with various statutes regarding bail, I.C. §§ 19-2901 et seq., with the authority of the department of insurance to regulate bail agents, I.”
State v. Ybarra, 634 P.2d 435 (Idaho 1981). · cites it 2× ““(9) Any other facts tending to indicate that he has strong ties to the community and is not likely to flee the jurisdiction. “(10) What reasonable restrictions, conditions and prohibitions should be placed upon his activities, movements, associations and residences.”
State v. Beck, 167 P.3d 788 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Once the judge has set the dollar amount of bail pursuant to I.C. §§ 19-2901 and 19-2902, a defendant has the option of depositing cash with the court clerk in the amount of the bail.”
State v. Two Jinn, Inc., 245 P.3d 1016 (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “[2] Idaho Code § 19-2927 was replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. § 19-2901, et seq., effective July 1, 2009, and our Supreme Court revised I.”
State v. Two Jinn, Inc., 230 P.3d 766 (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “90, § 1 and replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. § 19-2901 et. seq. Similarly, effective July 1, 2009, the Idaho Supreme Court repealed I.”
State v. Two Jinn, Inc., 228 P.3d 387 (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “90, § 1 and replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. § 19-2901 et. seq. Similarly, effective July 1, 2009, the Idaho Supreme Court repealed I.”
State v. Two Jinn, Inc., 228 P.3d 1019 (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “90, § 1 and replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. § 19-2901 et. seq. 2 . We note that discretion on exoneration of bond as between Idaho Code § 19-2927 and I.”
Sun Sur. v. Fourth Jud. Dist Ct (Idaho Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “90, § 1 and replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. §§ 19-2901 to -2923. Similarly, effective July 1, 2009, the Idaho Supreme Court repealed I.”
State v. Two Jinn, Inc. /Brett Robert Bardsley (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Although Two Jinn discusses both versions of the rule and statute in its brief, Two Jinn concedes that the standard applied is similar under both.”
State of Idaho v. Two Jinn, Inc./Rosendo Arriago Navarro (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Specifically, they do not obligate a bail bondsman to surrender a defendant to the court within 180 days after forfeiture of the bond.”
Unknown (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “90, § 1 and replaced by the Idaho Bail Act, I.C. § 19-2901 et. seq. 2 If, without sufficient excuse, the defendant neglects to appear before the court upon any occasion when his presence has been ordered the court must immediately direct the fact to be entered upon its minutes,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.