Title.
This act, comprising chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 26, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36, title 26, Idaho Code, as such chapters may be hereafter amended, shall be known as the "Idaho Bank Act" and shall be applicable to all corporations, copartnerships, cooperative associations and persons engaged in the business of banking in the state of Idaho.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1979–2002 · leading case:
Eliopulos v. Knox, 848 P.2d 984 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992).
Eliopulos v. Knox, 848 P.2d 984 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “In addition to liability imposed by common law, directors may be held statutorily liable under the provisions of the Idaho Bank Act, I.C. § 26-101, et seq. The Act provides that “[a]ny director, officer or other person who shall participate in any violation of the laws of this…”
Hopkins v. D.L. Evans Bank (In re Fox Bean Co.), 287 B.R. 270 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2002).
· cites it 2× “; Idaho Code § 26-101 et seq. In particular, Defendant cites Idaho Code § 28-4-401 1 for the proposition that a bank must honor directions given by the customer who owns an account pursuant to the account agreement.”
Palmer v. Idaho Bank & Trust of Kooskia, 603 P.2d 597 (Idaho 1979).
· cites it 2× “However, it should be noted that “the Bank Act” does not define the term “adverse claimant” and former I.C. § 26-101 does not extend the scope of the statute to cover the federal government or its executive subdivisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.