Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 26-1013 (2026)

Closed banks — Pledge or sale of assets by director or liquidator to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — Court order. 

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Closed banks — Pledge or sale of assets by director or liquidator to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — Court order. 

With respect to any banking institution, which is now or may hereafter be closed on account of inability to meet the demands of its depositors or by action of the director of the department of finance or of a court or by action of its directors or in the event of its insolvency or suspension, the director of the department of finance and/or the receiver or liquidator of such institution with the permission of said director of finance may borrow from said corporation and furnish any part or all of the assets of said institution to said corporation as security for a loan from same, provided, that where said corporation is acting as such receiver or liquidator, the order of a court of record of competent jurisdiction shall be first obtained approving such loan. Said director upon the order of a court of record of competent jurisdiction, and upon a like order and with the permission of said director, the receiver or liquidator of any such institution may sell to said corporation any part or all of the assets of such institution.

The provisions of this section shall not be construed to limit the power of any banking institution, the director of the department of finance or receivers or liquidators to pledge or sell assets in accordance with any existing law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Yacht Club Sales & Serv., Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank, 623 P.2d 464 (Idaho 1980).
Yacht Club Sales & Serv., Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank, 623 P.2d 464 (Idaho 1980). · cites it 4× “" Former I.C. § 26-1013. This particular provision was enacted in 1925.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.