Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 33-6704 (2026)
exemptions.
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
exemptions.
This chapter shall not apply:
(1) To single-occupancy restrooms and changing facilities or restrooms and changing facilities that are conspicuously designated for unisex or family use;
(2) To restrooms and changing facilities that have been temporarily designated for use by that person’s biological sex;
(3) To a person of one sex who uses a single-sex facility designated for the opposite sex, if such single-sex facility is the only facility reasonably available at the time of the person’s use of the facility;
(4) To a person employed to clean, maintain, or inspect a restroom or single-sex facility;
(5) To a person who enters a restroom or facility to render medical assistance;
(6) To a person who is in need of assistance and, for the purposes of receiving that assistance, is accompanied by a family member, a legal guardian, or the person’s designee who is a member of the designated sex for the single-sex restroom or changing facility;
(7) To coaching staff and personnel during athletic events; or
(8) During an ongoing natural disaster or emergency, or when necessary to prevent a serious threat to good order or student safety.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Roe v. Critchfield, 137 F.4th 912 (9th Cir. 2025).
Roe v. Critchfield, 137 F.4th 912 (9th Cir. 2025). “Because the statute does not limit the use of single-occupancy facilities to only transgender students, we cannot say on the existing record that observing a student accessing such a facility will necessarily disclose that student’s transgender status. We do not preclude the…”
Roe v. Critchfield, No. 23-2807, 2025 WL 1486985 (9th Cir. May 23, 2025). “Because the statute does not limit the use of single-occupancy facilities to only transgender students, we cannot say on the existing record that observing a student accessing such a facility will necessarily disclose that student’s transgender status.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.