Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 39-4303 (2026)

Fees.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Fees.

(1) The following fees shall be paid by the manufacturer of a modular building:

(a) Per building, one (1) building permit, plan review and inspection fee for structural, plumbing, electrical and HVAC, based upon the modular building permit fee schedule as provided in rule, plus ninety dollars ($90.00) and two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the plumbing, electrical and HVAC installation costs.

(b) The division may charge a one hundred dollar ($100) insignia fee in instances where building permit fees are not charged for modular buildings.

(2) All fees collected by the division under the provisions of this chapter shall be paid into the occupational licenses fund. The expenses incurred in administering and enforcing the provisions of this chapter shall be paid from the fund. The fees set forth in subsection (1) of this section and the modular building permit fees as provided in rule shall be the exclusive fee requirements applicable to modular buildings governed by the provisions of this chapter and shall supersede any program of any political subdivision of the state that sets fee requirements for the same inspections or services.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2004 · leading case: Sherwood v. Carter, 805 P.2d 452 (Idaho 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sherwood v. Carter, 805 P.2d 452 (Idaho 1991). · cites it 4× “, concurs. McDEVITT, J., and WINMILL, District Judge, Pro Tem.”

Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. Wasden, 376 F.3d 908 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 39-4303 (c). Thus, if parental consent is ordinarily necessary, but not “readily available” in a particular instance, a physician may, except with regard to abortion, go forward with an indicated medical procedure.”

Litz v. Robinson, 955 P.2d 113 (Idaho Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “§§ 6-1012 and 6-1013. The district court found that Litz failed to produce such expert testimony and granted the doctors’ motions for summary judgment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.