Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 39-4305 (2026)
Reciprocity of standards with other states.
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Reciprocity of standards with other states.
(1) If the administrator determines that standards for modular buildings that have been adopted by the statutes or rules of another state are at least equal to the standards adopted by the administrator, the administrator may so provide by rule.
(2) If the administrator determines that standards for modular buildings have not been adopted by another state, and modular buildings from that state are transported into this state to be offered for sale, the administrator may certify reciprocal states to inspect such modular buildings. If there is no reciprocity agreement with a state of manufacture, then Idaho will inspect the building, plumbing, electrical and HVAC, provided that the out-of-state manufacturer shall bear the costs of travel and inspection services related to such inspection. If the administrator shall then determine that the modular buildings meet the standards of this state, the product shall be acceptable and the administrator may issue insignia for said modular buildings.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–2001 · leading case: Rook v. Trout, 747 P.2d 61 (Idaho 1987).
Rook v. Trout, 747 P.2d 61 (Idaho 1987). “See I.C. § 39-4305 (presumption arises where signed consent form).”
Shabinaw v. Brown, 963 P.2d 1184 (Idaho 1998). “Section 39-4305 of the Idaho Code provides that a written consent, in the absence of convincing proof that it was secured maliciously or by fraud, is presumed to be valid for the furnishing of such care, treatment or procedures, and the advice and disclosures of the attending…”
Kovacs v. Freeman, 957 S.W.2d 251 (Ky. 1997). “Some state statutes even formally recognize this option, [citing Idaho Code § 39-4305 (1975) ] Consent obtained verbally is just as valid as consent gained in writing, provided that all the criteria for a valid consent have been met.”
Anderson v. Hollingsworth, 41 P.3d 228 (Idaho 2001). “Consent for the furnishing of hospital, medical, dental or surgical care, treatment or procedures shall be valid in all respects if the person giving it is sufficiently aware of pertinent facts respecting the need for, the nature of and the significant risks ordinarily attendant…”
Keyser v. St. Mary's Hosp., Inc., 662 F. Supp. 191 (D. Idaho 1987). “The provisions of Idaho Code § 39-4301 through § 39-4305 each refer to consent in the context of hospital, medical, surgical or dental care, treatment or procedures.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.