Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 43-1113 (2026)

Notice — Contents. 

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Notice — Contents. 

Such notice shall contain:

(a)  A statement of the date, time and place of the hearing;
(b)  A description of each lot or parcel proposed to be excluded;
(c)  The reasons for the exclusion stated in the resolution of intention; and
(d)  Notice to each person, firm and corporation interested in the proposed exclusion to appear at the district office at the date and time fixed, and file objections in writing showing cause, if any they may have, why the land or any part of it should not be excluded as proposed in the resolution of the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1935–2016 · leading case: Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc., 370 P.3d 738 (Idaho 2016).
Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc., 370 P.3d 738 (Idaho 2016). · cites it 4× “The issue was whether he was entitled to the disability benefits set forth in Idaho Code section 43-1113 (1932) (a prior version of section 72-428).”
Hix v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., 397 P.2d 237 (Idaho 1964). · cites it 5× “2d 769, 777 (1934), wherein it is stated: “ * * * The Compensation Law also provides for specific indemnities for certain injuries, as set forth in section 43-1113 [now I.C. § 72-313], when disability for work by reason of the loss of the various members of the body, enumerated…”
Peterson's Est. v. Jr Simplot Co., 358 P.2d 587 (Idaho 1961). · cites it 8× “§ 72-313), the Court having then observed that, proceeding upon such concession, “the disability is not to be determined as variably continuing, progressively healing, or eventually ceasing.” Clearly, such observation is descriptive of total disability which may be temporary in…”
Crawford v. Nielson, 307 P.2d 229 (Idaho 1957). · cites it 4× “The Compensation Law also provides for specific indemnities for certain injuries, as set forth in section 43-1113 [72-313], when disability for work by reason of the loss of the various members of the body enumerated is not to be taken in consideration.”
Oliver v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., 245 P.2d 775 (Idaho 1952). · cites it 2× “The order making the award is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance herewith.”
Cox v. Intermountain Lumber Co., 439 P.2d 931 (Idaho 1968). · cites it 2× “*201 specific indemnities set forth in section 43-1113 (predecessor to I.C. § 72-313), for, in determining those specific indemnities, the loss of earning power or capacity to work is not to be considered.”
Leach v. Grangeville High. Dist., 41 P.2d 618 (Idaho 1935). · cites it 4× “arising out of and in the course of employment is based on disability for work, and that there is another class of injuries, to which the one here under consideration belongs, for which specific indemnities have been provided, without regard to depreciated earning power, saying:…”
Burke v. Eg & G/Morrison-Knudsen Constr. Co., 885 P.2d 372 (Idaho 1994). · cites it 4× “This statute was I.C. § 43-1113 (1932), which contained the following provisions: In ease of the following injuries the compensation shall be fifty-five per cent of the average weekly wages, but not more than the weekly compensation provided in section 43-1110, in *415 addition…”
Olson v. Union Pac. R.R., 112 P.2d 1005 (Idaho 1941). · cites it 2× “Section 43-1113 provides specific indemnities, for members of the body therein specified, regardless of whether the injury results in loss of earning capacity or not.”
Gentry v. Bano, Inc., 430 P.2d 681 (Idaho 1967). · cites it 2× “, § 43-1113 [now I.C. 72-313.]” Id. at 313, 41 P.”
Herman v. Coeur D'Alene Hardware & Foundry Co., 208 P.2d 167 (Idaho 1949). · cites it 2× “t “claimant was partially disabled for work from April, 1944, to the present time” and in an amended petition alleged claimant “was disabled from work either totally or partially from June 3, 1942 to April, 1944, and from April, 1944, to the present time”, and further alleged…”
Keith Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc., No. 43468 (Idaho Mar. 24, 2016). · cites it 2× “The issue was whether he was entitled to the disability benefits set forth in Idaho Code section 43-1113 (1932) (a prior version of section 72-428).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.