Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 48-201 (2026)

Definitions. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Definitions. 

The following terms for the purposes of this act are hereby defined as follows:

(a)  "Person" means the plural as well as the singular and shall include an individual, partnership, association, a joint stock company, business trust and an incorporated as well as an unincorporated organization.
(b)  The term "price" as used herein shall mean the net price to the buyer after deduction of all discounts, rebates or other price concessions paid or allowed by the seller.
(c)  The term "commerce" means trade or commerce within this state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2008 · leading case: Pollard Oil Co. v. Christensen, 645 P.2d 344 (Idaho 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pollard Oil Co. v. Christensen, 645 P.2d 344 (Idaho 1982). · cites it 2× “) and the Idaho Anti-Price Discrimination Act (I.C. § 48-201 et seq.) The district court ruled against the appellants on these claims, and we find no error in this regard.”
Jackson v. Wood, 859 P.2d 378 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “, unlawful price discrimination under I.C. § 48-201 et seq., unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of the ICPA, I.”
Gen. Auto Parts Co. v. Genuine Parts Co., 293 F. App'x 515 (9th Cir. 2008). “, and the Idaho Anti-Price Discrimination Act, Idaho Code Ann. § 48-201 et seq. General alleged that GPC’s auto-part quantity discounts constituted unlawful price discrimination against General, in favor of Dyna Parts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.