Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 49-654 (2026)
Basic rule and maximum speed limits.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Basic rule and maximum speed limits.
(1) No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. Consistent with the foregoing, every person shall drive at a safe and appropriate speed when approaching and crossing an intersection or railroad grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hillcrest, when traveling on any narrow or winding highway, and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
(2)(a) Where no special hazard or condition exists that requires lower speed for compliance with subsection (1) of this section, the limits as hereinafter authorized shall be maximum lawful speeds, and no person shall drive a vehicle at a speed in excess of the maximum limits:
(i) Thirty-five (35) miles per hour in any residential, business or urban district, unless otherwise posted in accordance with section 49-207(2) or (3), Idaho Code;
(ii) Seventy-five (75) miles per hour on interstate highways, unless otherwise posted in accordance with section 49-201(4), Idaho Code, and provided that this speed may be increased to eighty (80) miles per hour if the department completes an engineering and traffic study on the interstate highway and concludes that the increase is in the public interest and the transportation board concurs with such conclusion;
(iii) Sixty-five (65) miles per hour on state highways, unless otherwise posted in accordance with section 49-201(4), Idaho Code, and provided that this speed may be increased to seventy (70) miles per hour if the department completes an engineering and traffic study on the state highway and concludes that the increase is in the public interest and the transportation board concurs with such conclusion;
(iv) Fifty-five (55) miles per hour in other locations, unless otherwise posted, up to a maximum of seventy (70) miles per hour.
(b) Subject to all other applicable motor vehicle laws, a driver of a passenger car, motorcycle or pickup truck, not towing any other vehicle, may exceed the posted speed limit by up to fifteen (15) miles per hour while passing another vehicle traveling at less than the posted speed limit, in order to safely pass the vehicle. The overtaking vehicle shall return to the right-hand lane and reduce speed to the posted speed limit as soon as practicable. This paragraph shall be applicable only to:
(i) Passing on the left on roadways divided into two (2) lanes providing only one (1) lane of traffic in each direction and where the posted speed limit is fifty-five (55) miles per hour or greater; or
(ii) Passing one (1) or more vehicles traveling in the same direction while in a passing lane. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "passing lane" means an extra roadway lane created by widening a length of roadway to allow faster-moving vehicles to overtake slower-moving vehicles traveling in the same direction without crossing into an opposing travel lane. This subparagraph shall not apply to a vehicle that passes on the right within a passing lane area or to a vehicle that overtakes another vehicle by moving into an opposing traffic lane. This subparagraph shall not apply to roadways with a posted speed limit below fifty-five (55) miles per hour or to any portion of a roadway that is within an incorporated city.
(iii) This paragraph shall not be applicable in construction zones. For purposes of basic rule violations and penalties imposed pursuant to this section and Idaho infraction rule 9, the fifteen (15) mile per hour allowance in passing situations provided in this paragraph shall be deemed to be the maximum speed limit from which fines are determined.
(3) For vehicles with five (5) or more axles operating at a gross weight of more than twenty-six thousand (26,000) pounds, the maximum lawful speed limit on interstate highways in nonurban areas shall not exceed ten (10) miles per hour less for vehicles with less than five (5) axles and operating at a gross weight of twenty-six thousand (26,000) pounds or less, and in urban areas the maximum lawful speed limit on interstate highways for such vehicles shall not exceed sixty-five (65) miles per hour.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: State v. Williamson, 166 P.3d 387 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Williamson, 166 P.3d 387 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). “At trial, both police officers testified, as did Williamson, who was acting pro se.”
State v. Nathan David Neal, 362 P.3d 514 (Idaho 2015). “§ 49-651 (requiring driver emerging from an alley, building, private road or driveway to stop prior to entering a sidewalk); I.C. § 49-654(1) (requiring drivers to proceed at “a safe and appropriate speed” “when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians”); I.”
Woodward v. Taylor, 366 P.3d 432 (Wash. 2016). “Idaho Code § 49-654 (2)(b). Conversely, Washington sets its maximum speed limit on state highways at 60 mph, which may be increased to 75 mph by the secretary of transportation upon a determination that the increased speed would be reasonable and safe.”
Peck v. State, Dep't of Transp., 278 P.3d 439 (Idaho Ct. App. 2012). “Peek argues section 49-654 provides specific circumstances where a speed limit upon a highway within city limits can be 35 mph and that the statute specifies the type of districts where these circumstances apply-namely, residential, business, and urban districts.”
State v. McCarthy, 982 P.2d 954 (Idaho Ct. App. 1999). “The district court, applying I.C. § 49-654, determined in its appellate opinion that the actual speed limit was fifty-five miles per hour and that McCarthy therefore was not speeding when he passed through the intersection going forty-five miles per hour.”
State v. Estes, 223 P.3d 287 (Idaho Ct. App. 2009). “Estes appeals from the district court’s intermediate appellate decision affirming the magistrate court’s judgment in which it found that Estes committed the infraction of speeding, Idaho Code § 49-654 (2). Estes asserts that the state trooper’s testimony concerning his visual…”
Martin v. Hackworth, 896 P.2d 976 (Idaho 1995). “At the conclusion of the trial, Martin requested the following jury instruction, taken from I.C. § 49-654, to address Hackworth’s violation of the speed limit: (1) No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having…”
State v. McNair, 108 P.3d 410 (Idaho Ct. App. 2005). “§ 49-1401(3), as the underlying unlawful act and the second alternative was apparently referring to a violation of Idaho's basic speed rule, I.C. § 49-654(1).”
State v. George, 905 P.2d 626 (Idaho 1995). “The officer issued two citations: the first was for speeding under I.C. § 49-654(2) and for failing to provide proof of insurance under I.”
State v. Stephen D. L'Abbe, 324 P.3d 1016 (Idaho Ct. App. 2014). “L’Abbe appeals from the district court’s intermediate appellate decision affirming L’Abbe’s judgment of conviction for speeding, a violation of Idaho Code § 49-654 (2), entered by the magistrate court.”
Dabestani v. Bellus, 961 P.2d 633 (Idaho 1998). “The effect of this instruction, in conjunction with the instruction based on I.C. § 49-654, was to make it negligence per se for Dabestani to be driving in excess of thirty-five miles per hour when the accident happened, even though the speed limit should have been forty-five…”
State v. Kane, 836 P.2d 569 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992). “Robert Kane appeals from the district court’s memorandum opinion affirming the order of the magistrate finding him guilty of speeding in violation of I.C. § 49-654. Kane contends that the magistrate erred in denying his motion in limine wherein he requested that the court not…”
— Idaho Code § 49-654(1) — 4 cases
State v. Nathan David Neal, 362 P.3d 514 (Idaho 2015). “§ 49-651 (requiring driver emerging from an alley, building, private road or driveway to stop prior to entering a sidewalk); I.C. § 49-654(1) (requiring drivers to proceed at “a safe and appropriate speed” “when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians”); I.”
State v. McNair, 108 P.3d 410 (Idaho Ct. App. 2005). “§ 49-1401(3), as the underlying unlawful act and the second alternative was apparently referring to a violation of Idaho's basic speed rule, I.C. § 49-654(1).”
State v. Morgan, 1 P.3d 832 (Idaho Ct. App. 2000).
Magee v. J.R. Simplot Co. (D. Idaho 2021).
— Idaho Code § 49-654(2) — 6 cases
State v. Williamson, 166 P.3d 387 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007). “At trial, both police officers testified, as did Williamson, who was acting pro se.”
State v. George, 905 P.2d 626 (Idaho 1995). “The officer issued two citations: the first was for speeding under I.C. § 49-654(2) and for failing to provide proof of insurance under I.”
Martin v. Hackworth, 896 P.2d 976 (Idaho 1995). “At the conclusion of the trial, Martin requested the following jury instruction, taken from I.C. § 49-654, to address Hackworth’s violation of the speed limit: (1) No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having…”
Dabestani v. Bellus, 961 P.2d 633 (Idaho 1998). “The effect of this instruction, in conjunction with the instruction based on I.C. § 49-654, was to make it negligence per se for Dabestani to be driving in excess of thirty-five miles per hour when the accident happened, even though the speed limit should have been forty-five…”
State v. Smith (Idaho Ct. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.