Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 49-704 (2026)
Crossing at other than crosswalks.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Crossing at other than crosswalks.
(1) Every pedestrian crossing a highway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the highway.
(2) Any pedestrian crossing a highway at a point where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the highway.
(3) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation, pedestrians shall not cross at any place except in a marked crosswalk.
(4) No pedestrian shall cross a highway intersection diagonally unless authorized by traffic-control devices. When authorized to cross diagonally, pedestrians shall cross only in accordance with the traffic-control devices pertaining to crossing movements.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: State v. Paulson, 501 P.3d 873 (Idaho 2022).
State v. Paulson, 501 P.3d 873 (Idaho 2022). “” (Citing Idaho Code § 49-704 (1).) Requested Instruction Number 6 provided: “Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation, pedestrians shall not cross at any place except in a marked cross walk.”
Warren v. Furniss, 861 P.2d 1219 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993). “Theory of the Case Instruction The appellants next contend that the court erred in failing to give a requested instruction based on I.C. § 49-704(1), which provides: Every pedestrian crossing the highway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked…”
State v. Paulson (Idaho 2022). “” (Citing Idaho Code § 49-704 (1).) Requested Instruction Number 6 provided: “Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation, pedestrians shall not cross at any place except in a marked cross walk.”
— Idaho Code § 49-704(1) — 1 case
Warren v. Furniss, 861 P.2d 1219 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993). “Theory of the Case Instruction The appellants next contend that the court erred in failing to give a requested instruction based on I.C. § 49-704(1), which provides: Every pedestrian crossing the highway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.