Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 6-1005 (2026)
Tolling of limitation periods during pendency of proceedings.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Tolling of limitation periods during pendency of proceedings.
There shall be no judicial or other review or appeal of such matters. No party shall be obliged to comply with or otherwise affected or prejudiced by the proposals, conclusions or suggestions of the panel or any member or segment thereof; however, in the interest of due consideration being given to such proceedings and in the interest of encouraging consideration of claims informally and without the necessity of litigation, the applicable statute of limitations shall be tolled and not be deemed to run during the time that such a claim is pending before such a panel and for thirty (30) days thereafter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: James v. Buck, 727 P.2d 1136 (Idaho 1986).
James v. Buck, 727 P.2d 1136 (Idaho 1986). “The district court agreed with the defendants, holding that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Rudd v. Merritt, 66 P.3d 230 (Idaho 2003). “Do Idaho Code §§ 6-1005 and 6-1006 toll the six-month period for service of the summons and complaint required by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure? B.”
Stuard v. Jorgenson, 249 P.3d 1156 (Idaho 2011). “[4] Idaho Code § 6-1005 provides: There shall be no judicial or other review or appeal of such matters.”
Reis v. Cox, 660 P.2d 46 (Idaho 1982). “I.C. § 6-1005 states that "the applicable statute of limitations shall be tolled .”
Carol English v. James Taylor, D.O., 378 P.3d 1036 (Idaho 2016). “Thus, the cause of action accrued on September 17, 2011, and pursuant to Idaho Code section 5-219, the Englishes had two years from that date to commence their medical malpractice suit against Respondents. The Englishes filed an application and claim for a medical malpractice…”
Conway v. Sonntag, 106 P.3d 470 (Idaho 2005). “Although the filing of the request for a prelitigation screening panel on November 8, 2001, would toll the running of *146 the statute of limitations, I.C. § 6-1005, the statute had already run with respect to negligence allegedly occurring on October 5, 1999.”
Taylor v. Chamberlain, D.O., 302 P.3d 35 (Idaho 2013). “2d 1136, 1137 (1986); I.C. § 6-1005. At the conclusion of the proceedings, the panel provides the parties with an advisory, nonbinding report indicating their view of the merits of the matter.”
Smith v. Graham, 147 P.3d 859 (Kan. 2006). “); Idaho Code § 6-1005 (2004); Me. Rev. Stat.”
Wiseman v. Rencher, 553 P.3d 948 (Idaho 2024). “]” I.C. § 6-1005 (third alteration in original).”
Moss v. Bjornson, 765 P.2d 676 (Idaho 1988). “The proceedings before the prelitigation panel are "informal": Proceedings conducted or maintained under the authority of this act shall at all times be confidential, privileged and immune from civil process and evidence of them or results, findings or determinations thereof…”
Evans v. Wright, 554 P.3d 591 (Idaho 2024). “See I.C. § 6-1005 (“[T]he applicable statute of limitations shall be tolled and not be deemed to run during the time that such a claim is pending before such a panel and for thirty (30) days thereafter.”
Dodd v. Jones, 566 P.3d 379 (Idaho 2025). “3d 470, 472 (2005); I.C. § 6-1005. 5 ADVANCING EXPERTS. Plaintiffs and Counterclaimants shall identify and disclose all expert witnesses to be used at trial by November 4, 2022.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.