Judgment of ouster — Fine.
When a defendant against whom such action has been brought is adjudged guilty of usurping or intruding into or unlawfully holding any office, franchise or privilege, judgment must be rendered that such defendant be excluded from the office, franchise or privilege, and that he pay the costs of the action. The court may also, in its discretion, in actions to which the people of the state are a party, impose upon the defendant a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, which fine, when collected, must be paid into the treasury of the state.
Notes of Decisions
People ex rel. Neilson v. Wilkins, 614 P.2d 417 (Idaho 1980).
· cites it 4× “00 fine, pursuant to I.C. § 6-608. Dismissing the State's action, the district court held that I.”
State v. Keithly, 314 P.3d 146 (Idaho 2013).
· cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 6-608 provides as follows: When a defendant against whom such action has been brought is adjudged guilty of usurping or intruding into or unlawfully holding any office, franchise or privilege, judgment must be rendered that such defendant be excluded from the…”
State v. Keithly (Idaho 2013).
· cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 6-608 provides as follows: When a defendant against whom such action has been brought is adjudged guilty of usurping or intruding into or unlawfully holding any office, franchise or privilege, judgment must be rendered that such defendant be excluded from the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.