Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 67-429B (2026)

Authorized tribal video gaming machines. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Authorized tribal video gaming machines. 

(1) Indian tribes are authorized to conduct gaming using tribal video gaming machines pursuant to state-tribal gaming compacts which specifically permit their use. A tribal video gaming machine may be used to conduct gaming only by an Indian tribe, is not activated by a handle or lever, does not dispense coins, currency, tokens, or chips, and performs only the following functions:

(a)  Accepts currency or other representative of value to qualify a player to participate in one or more games;
(b)  Dispenses, at the player’s request, a cash out ticket that has printed upon it the game identifier and the player’s credit balance;
(c)  Shows on a video screen or other electronic display, rather than on a paper ticket, the results of each game played;
(d)  Shows on a video screen or other electronic display, in an area separate from the game results, the player’s credit balance;
(e)  Selects randomly, by computer, numbers or symbols to determine game results; and
(f)  Maintains the integrity of the operations of the terminal.
(2)  Notwithstanding any other provision of Idaho law, a tribal video gaming machine as described in subsection (1) above is not a slot machine or an electronic or electromechanical imitation or simulation of any form of casino gambling.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2019 · leading case: Knox v. State Ex Rel. Otter, 223 P.3d 266 (Idaho 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Knox v. State Ex Rel. Otter, 223 P.3d 266 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 11× “In its recitation of relevant facts, the Circuit Court noted: Proposition One added two sections to the Idaho Code, 67-429B and 67-429C. Section 429B allows “Indian tribes .”
Regan v. Denney, 437 P.3d 15 (Idaho 2019). “In the 2003 Order, this Court determined section 34-1809(4) did not confer original jurisdiction to this Court, stating that the legislature had no power to extend this Court's original jurisdiction.”
State of Idaho v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, 465 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 2006). “Proposition One added two sections to the Idaho Code, 67-429B and 67-429C. Section 429B allows “Indian tribes .”
Knox v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 759 F. Supp. 2d 1223 (D. Idaho 2010). · cites it 3× “Proposition One added two sections to the Idaho Code, 67-429B and 67-429C. Section 429B authorizes “Indian tribes .”
— Idaho Code § 67-429B(l) — 1 case
Knox v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 759 F. Supp. 2d 1223 (D. Idaho 2010). “Proposition One added two sections to the Idaho Code, 67-429B and 67-429C. Section 429B authorizes “Indian tribes .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.