Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-5240 (2026)
Contested cases.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Contested cases.
A proceeding by an agency other than the public utilities commission or the industrial commission that may result in the issuance of an order is a contested case and is governed by the provisions of this chapter, except as provided by other provisions of law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010).
Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010). “" I.C. § 67-5240. Thus, for jurisdiction to exist under subsection 2, Respondents must be challenging a final agency action that is not an order in a contested case as that term is defined by statute.”
Maresh v. State, Dep't of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Caballero, 970 P.2d 14 (Idaho 1998). “" I.C. § 67-5240. Consequently, the provisions of IDAPA governing contested cases must be followed when an agency engages in a proceeding that may result in the issuance of an order.”
Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. State, 207 P.3d 963 (Idaho 2009). “" I.C. § 67-5240 (emphasis added); Westway, 139 Idaho at 111 , 73 P.”
Westway Constr., Inc. v. Idaho Transp. Dep't, 73 P.3d 721 (Idaho 2003). “” IDAHO CODE § 67-5240 (2001). To be a contested case, the proceeding must be by an “agency,” which Idaho Code § 67-5201 (2) defines as follows: “Agency” means each state board, commission, department or officer authorized by law to make rules or to determine contested cases,…”
Druffel v. State, Dep't of Transp., 41 P.3d 739 (Idaho 2002). “01 and the language of the Notice of Suspension Advisory Form properly before the district court? STANDARD OF REVIEW Idaho Code § 67-5240 provides that all proceedings by an agency that may result in the issuance of an “order” are governed by pi’ovisions of the Idaho…”
Barron v. Idaho Dep't of Water Resources, 18 P.3d 219 (Idaho 2001). “Standard of Review Idaho Code section 67-5240 provides that all proceedings by an agency other than the Public Utilities Commission or the Industrial Commission that may result in the issuance of an “order” are governed by provisions of the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act…”
Wood v. ITD, 532 P.3d 404 (Idaho 2023). “3d 1027 , 1031 (2021); see I.C. § 67-5240 (“Contested Cases”). Idaho Code section 18-8002A(8) authorizes judicial review of an ALS hearing officer’s decision in the manner provided for judicial review of final agency actions under the APA (Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code).”
Vickers v. Lowe, 247 P.3d 666 (Idaho 2011). “3. Whether the district court properly awarded attorney fees and costs to the ITD below.”
Wanner v. State, Dep't of Transp., 244 P.3d 1250 (Idaho 2011). “§§ 18-8002, 18-8002A, and I.C. § 49-326(4).” On September 22, 2009, IDOT timely appealed to this Court.”
Williams v. State, Bd. of Real Est. Appraisers, 239 P.3d 780 (Idaho 2010). “Idaho Code § 67-5240 . Under Idaho Code § 67-5270 (3), a party can obtain judicial review of “a final order in a contested case.”
A & B Irrigation Dist. v. Idaho Dep't of Water Resources, 301 P.3d 1270 (Idaho 2012). “§ 67-5201(2), and the Act does not apply to the public utilities commission and the industrial commission when they are hearing contested cases, I.C. § 67-5240. 4 additional time for the Department to respond to the Petition” and that “[a]n order responding to the merits of the…”
Noble v. Kootenai Cnty., 231 P.3d 1034 (Idaho 2010). “Idaho Code § 67-5242 applies to "contested cases,” and the I.C. § 67-5240 definition of "contested case” begins "[a] proceeding by an agency therefore, the requirements mandated by I.”
— Idaho Code § 67-5240(d) — 1 case
Barron v. Idaho Dep't of Water Resources, 18 P.3d 219 (Idaho 2001). “Standard of Review Idaho Code section 67-5240 provides that all proceedings by an agency other than the Public Utilities Commission or the Industrial Commission that may result in the issuance of an “order” are governed by provisions of the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.