Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 7-921 (2026)

Uniformity of interpretation. 

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Uniformity of interpretation. 

This act shall be so construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2010 · leading case: Wolfe v. Farm Bureau Ins., 913 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1996).
Wolfe v. Farm Bureau Ins., 913 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1996). · cites it 4× “" I.C. § 7-921. Since no assistance is provided by the legislature as to how to reconcile these provisions of the Idaho Code, this Court must turn to its rules of statutory construction.”
Driver v. SI CORP., 80 P.3d 1024 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 7-914 includes attorney fees is not clear on its face.”
Grease Spot, Inc. v. Harnes, 226 P.3d 524 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 7-921. The general consensus among other state appellate courts in interpreting their respective § 7-914 counterparts is that the district court may award confirmation fees in its discretion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.