Modifying commitment order based on single offense finding
Also stated as: Commitment Order Validity and Modification Procedures
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Modifying commitment order based on single offense finding
- Cited for: Determining the validity of commitment orders
- Cited for: Determining when procedural errors warrant reversal of commitment order
- Cited for: Modifying commitment order based on single offense finding
- Cited for: Reversing commitment orders due to evidentiary errors
Ranked by how often Illinois courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Illinois opinions citing these pages
- People v. Rickman, 2025 IL App (5th) 230063-U
- People v. Reed, 2024 IL App (4th) 221074-U
- People v. White, 2023 IL App (5th) 220073-U
- People v. Petrov, 2023 IL App (1st) 160498, 239 N.E.3d 554
- People v. Taylor, 2020 IL App (3d) 160589-U
- People v. Reddick, 2019 IL App (1st) 150331-U
- People v. Rebollar-Vergara, 2019 IL App (2d) 140871
- People v. Nelson, 2017 IL 120198
- People v. Cowart, 2017 IL App (1st) 113085
- People v. Doolan, 2016 IL App (1st) 141780
- People v. Williams, 2016 IL App (1st) 133459
- People v. Doolan, 2016 IL App (1st) 141780, 67 N.E.3d 485
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 9 opinions
- 20 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 56 opinions
- 29 opinions
- 9 opinions
Filed under: Judicial Orders and Their Correction
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law