Treating modified contracts as new single agreements
Also stated as: Contract modification and amendment doctrines
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Treating modified contracts as new single agreements
- Cited for: Severing contract provisions and modifying agreements
- Cited for: Incorporating old contract into new contract consideration
- Cited for: Service bulletins not modifying contract terms
Ranked by how often Illinois courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Illinois opinions citing these pages
- In re Marriage of Nadolski, 2025 IL App (3d) 240346-U
- Hwang v. Pathway LaGrange Prop. Owner, LLC, 2024 IL App (1st) 240534, 260 N.E.3d 99
- Archford Capital Strategies, LLC v. Davis, 2023 IL App (5th) 210377, 226 N.E.3d 63
- Bain v. Airoom, LLC, 2022 IL App (1st) 211001, 207 N.E.3d 1015
- 1030 W.North Ave, Bldg., LLC v. Firm, 2022 IL App (1st) 200588-U
- Apollo Theater Chicago LLC v. Baker Lincoln, LLC, 2022 IL App (1st) 201103-U
- First Am. Bank v. Poplar Creek, LLC, 2020 IL App (1st) 192450
- First Am. Bank v. Poplar Creek, LLC, 2020 IL App (1st) 192450, 188 N.E.3d 780
- Forgash v. Lesaint Logistics, LLC, 2020 IL App (1st) 192631-U
- Szafranski v. Dunston, 2015 IL App (1st) 122975-B, 34 N.E.3d 1132
- Szafranski v. Dunston, 2015 IL App (1st) 122975, 34 N.E.3d 1132
- In re Marriage of Heinrich, 2014 IL App (2d) 121333, 7 N.E.3d 889
- Urban Sites of Chicago, LLC v. Crown Castle USA, 2012 IL App (1st) 111880, 979 N.E.2d 480
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 7 opinions
- 15 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 45 opinions
- 20 opinions
Filed under: Contract; Modification; Oral
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law