ILCS » Chapter 105 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

105 ILCS 5/1B-1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(105 ILCS 5/1B-1) (from Ch. 122, par. 1B-1)
    Sec. 1B-1. Short title. This Article may be cited as the School District Financial Oversight Panel and Emergency Financial Assistance Law.
(Source: P.A. 88-618, eff. 9-9-94.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2020 · leading case: East St. Louis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis Sch. Dist. No. 189 Fin. Oversight Panel, 687 N.E.2d 1050 (Ill. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
East St. Louis Fed'n of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis Sch. Dist. No. 189 Fin. Oversight Panel, 687 N.E.2d 1050 (Ill. 1997). “189 from removing the members of the school board from office and sought a declaratory judgment that section 1B-20 of the School District Financial Oversight Panel and Emergency Financial Assistance Law (Emergency Financial Assistance Law) (105 ILCS 5/1B-1 et seq. (West 1994))…”
Bd. of Educ. v. Fin. Oversight Panel, 811 N.E.2d 692 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “It is not the status of the agency that controls whether judicial review of its action is appropriate or available, but it is the nature of the action or decision taken that controls.”
Restore Constr. Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Proviso Twp. High Schs. Dist. 209, 2020 IL 125133 (Ill. 2020). “In 2008, the State Board of Education established an FOP to oversee the District pursuant to the School District Financial Oversight Panel and Emergency Financial Assistance Law (105 ILCS 5/1B-1 et seq. (West 2008)). The District subsequently became subject to the Financial…”
East St. Louis Sch. Dist. No. 189 Bd. of Educ. v. East St. Louis Sch. Dist. No. 189 Fin. Oversight Panel (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “(West 2002)) does not apply to decisions made by the Oversight Panel, because the statute creating and empowering the Oversight Panel (105 ILCS 5/1B-1 et seq. (West 2002)) does not so provide.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.