Illinois Compiled Statutes
205 ILCS 635/4-12 (2026)
Appeal and Review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(205 ILCS 635/4-12)
(from Ch. 17, par. 2324-12)
Sec. 4-12.
Appeal and Review.
(a) Any person or entity affected by a
decision of the Commissioner under any provision of this Act may obtain
review of such decision within the Office of the Commissioner.
(b) The Commissioner shall, in accordance with the "Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act", promulgate rules and regulations to provide
for review within the Office of the Commissioner (hereinafter referred to
as "agency review") of his or her decisions affecting the rights of entities
under this Act. Such review shall provide for, at a minimum:
(1) appointment of a hearing officer other than a regular employee of
the Office of the Commissioner;
(2) appropriate procedural rules, specific deadlines for filings, and
standards of evidence and of proof;
(3) provision for apportioning costs among parties to the appeal.
(c) All final agency determinations of appeals to decisions of the
Commissioner may be reviewed in accordance with and under the provisions
of the "Administrative Review Law". Appeals from all final orders and
judgments entered by a court in review of any final administrative decision
of the Commissioner or of any final agency review of a decision of the
Commissioner may be taken as in other civil cases.
(Source: P.A. 85-735.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maka, 2017 IL App (1st) 153010 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maka, 2017 IL App (1st) 153010 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “205 ILCS 635/4-12 (West 2012). ¶ 14 In support of his argument, defendant relies solely on the Second District case of Dina, which considered the question of whether a violation of the License Act would result in a void mortgage.”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Maka, 2017 IL App (1st) 153010 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “205 ILCS 635/4-12 (West 2012). ¶ 14 In support of his argument, defendant relies solely on the Second District case of Dina, which considered the question of whether a violation of the License Act would result in a void mortgage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|