ILCS » Chapter 220 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

220 ILCS 5/10-111 (2026)

In any hearing, proceeding, investigation, or rulemaking conducted by the Commission, the Commission, commissioner, or administrative law judge presiding, shall, after the close of evidentiary hearings, prepare a recommended or tentative decision, finding, or order, including a statement of findings and conclusions and the reasons or basis therefore, on all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(220 ILCS 5/10-111) (from Ch. 111 2/3, par. 10-111)
    Sec. 10-111. In any hearing, proceeding, investigation, or rulemaking conducted by the Commission, the Commission, commissioner, or administrative law judge presiding, shall, after the close of evidentiary hearings, prepare a recommended or tentative decision, finding, or order, including a statement of findings and conclusions and the reasons or basis therefore, on all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record. Such recommended or tentative decision, finding, or order shall be served on all parties who shall be entitled to a reasonable opportunity to respond thereto, either in briefs or comments otherwise to be filed or separately. The recommended or tentative decision, finding, or order and any responses thereto shall be included in the record for decision. This Section shall not apply to any hearing, proceeding, or investigation conducted under Section 13-515.
(Source: P.A. 100-840, eff. 8-13-18.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: City of Elgin v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2016 IL App (2d) 150047 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Elgin v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2016 IL App (2d) 150047 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “” 220 ILCS 5/10-111 (West 2012). The Commission found that the Project would reduce congestion and result in lower electric costs for customers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.