ILCS » Chapter 225 · Act 65
Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 65/50-1 (2026)

This Act may be cited as the Nurse Practice Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 65/50-1) (was 225 ILCS 65/5-1)
    (Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2028)
    Sec. 50-1. This Act may be cited as the Nurse Practice Act.
(Source: P.A. 95-639, eff. 10-5-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: Demesa v. Adams, 2013 IL App (1st) 122608 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Demesa v. Adams, 2013 IL App (1st) 122608 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “OPINION ¶1 The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Professional Regulation (Department), filed a complaint against Lovejoy Demesa, a licensed registered nurse under the Nurse Practice Act (Act) (225 ILCS 65/50-1 et seq. (West 2010)), in which it…”
Corah v. The Bruss Co., 2017 IL App (1st) 161030 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “The reviewing court observed that “[f]alsifying a patient’s medical record with fabricated results of blood glucose tests would have warranted revocation of [the plaintiff’s] license” under provisions of the Nurse Practice Act (225 ILCS 65/50-1 et seq. (West 2012)). Young, 2015…”
Rodrigues v. Quinn, 2013 IL App (1st) 121196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “Rodrigues, was licensed as a registered nurse pursuant to the Nurse Practice Act (now 225 ILCS 65/50-1 et seq. (West 2010)), and she practiced nursing until 2001, when she was convicted of aggravated criminal sexual assault for having a relationship with a 17-year-old neighbor.”
Corah v. The Bruss Co., 2017 IL App (1st) 161030 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “The reviewing court observed that “[f]alsifying a patient’s medical record with fabricated results of blood glucose tests would have warranted revocation of [the plaintiff’s] license” under provisions of the Nurse Practice Act (225 ILCS 65/50-1 et seq. (West 2012)). Young, 2015…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.