Illinois Compiled Statutes
35 ILCS 200/16-195 (2026)
Review of decisions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 200/16-195)
Sec. 16-195.
Review of decisions.
Final administrative decisions of
the Property Tax Appeal Board are subject to review under the provisions of the
Administrative Review Law, except that in every case where a change in
assessed valuation of $300,000 or more was sought, that review shall be
afforded directly in the Appellate Court for the district in which the property
involved in the Board's decision is situated, and not in the circuit court. The
Property Tax Appeal Board shall certify the record of its proceedings only if
the taxpayer or other entity seeking review under the Administrative Review Law
pays to it for each page of legal size or smaller, the sum of 75¢ per page for
testimony taken before the Board and 25¢ per page for all other matters
contained in the record, and for any page larger than legal size the sum of $1,
except that these charges may be waived when the Board is satisfied that the
aggrieved party cannot afford to pay such charges. There shall be no charge to
the taxpayer or other entity for certification by the Property Tax Appeal Board
of any pages of the record which are furnished for inclusion in the record by
the taxpayer or other entity seeking review. If payment for the record is not
made by the taxpayer or other entity within 30 days after notice from the Board
or the Attorney General of the cost thereof, the court in which the proceeding
is pending, on motion of the Board, shall dismiss the complaint.
(Source: P.A. 87-1189; 88-455.)
(35 ILCS 200/Art. 16 Div. 5 heading) Division 5.
Department of Revenue
|
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Millennium Park Jt. Venture, LLC v. Houlihan, 948 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2010).
Millennium Park Jt. Venture, LLC v. Houlihan, 948 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2010). “Here, the Property Tax Code only adopts the Administrative Review Law with respect to final decisions of the Department of Revenue (35 ILCS 200/8-40 (West 2008)) and the Property Tax Appeal Board (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2008)). The Property Tax Code has not expressly adopted…”
Raymond Heyde v. Gary Pittenger, 633 F.3d 512 (7th Cir. 2011). “3d at 522 (finding it important to the determination of whether the official was entitled to absolute immunity that Illinois statute afforded judicial review against board decisions).”
Madison Two Assocs. v. Pappas, 884 N.E.2d 142 (Ill. 2008). “35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2002). [4] Pappas serves as the county collector by virtue of her office as treasurer of Cook County.”
John J. Moroney & Co. v. Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2013 IL App (1st) 120493 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Because Moroney requested an assessment reduction in excess of $300,000 before the PTAB, direct administrative review is afforded in this court pursuant to section 16-195 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2008)), and, therefore, we have jurisdiction to decide…”
1411 North State Condo. v. The Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2016 IL App (1st) 143757 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2014). Accordingly, we have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 (Ill.”
Cent. Nursing Realty, LLC v. Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2020 IL App (1st) 180994 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “” ¶ 30 Central Nursing timely petitioned for our review of the Board’s decision.”
Oregon Cmty. Unit Sch. v. Ptab, 674 N.E.2d 129 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “Because the respondent sought a reduction of more than $300,000 in the assessed value of its property, we take this direct review of the PTAB's decision (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 1994)) and affirm.”
Shawnee Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 84 v. Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2022 IL App (5th) 190266 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2018). 2 ¶5 Prior to 2013, Ameren Corporation (Ameren), a public utility company, owned the subject property.”
West Loop Assocs., LLC v. Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2017 IL App (1st) 151998 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “We have jurisdiction over this direct appeal from PTAB due to section 16-195 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2014)) because West Loop petitioned for at least a $300,000 change in the assessed valuation of its property.”
Sycamore Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 427 v. Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2014 IL App (2d) 130055 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2012). The Board and the School District argue that the PTAB erred in applying section 10-30 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/10-30 (West 2006)), which is known as the developer’s relief provision.”
West Loop Assocs., LLC v. The Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2017 IL App (1st) 151998 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “We have jurisdiction over this direct appeal from PTAB due to section 16-195 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2014)) because West Loop petitioned for at least a $300,000 change in the assessed valuation of its property.”
Cook Cnty. Bd. of Review v. Illinois Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 2023 IL App (1st) 210799-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “¶ 19 The BOR petitioned for review in this court pursuant to section 16-195 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2020) (final decisions of the PTAB are subject to direct review in the appellate court when a change in assessed value of $300,000 or more is sought)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|