Illinois Compiled Statutes
410 ILCS 255/6 (2026)
Vendor compliance with law
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 255/6)
(from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 7556)
Sec. 6.
Vendor compliance with law.
(a) The Department shall develop a system for monitoring the
operations of all WIC retail food vendors to ensure compliance with federal
and State laws and rules governing the WIC program.
(b) The Department shall review the alleged
violations of the
federal and State laws and the rules promulgated thereunder.
(c) The Department shall develop, by rule, a system of monetary
penalties and other sanctions for any vendor, former vendor, individual,
firm, corporation,
partnership, sole proprietorship, association, commercial enterprise, business
entity, or legal entity
determined to be in
violation of this Act or program regulations. The level and severity of
the sanctions
shall be consistent with the type and frequency of violations, and may
include, but shall not be limited to, suspension or termination from the
program as well as monetary penalties.
(Source: P.A. 91-691, eff. 4-13-00.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–1999 · leading case: People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. 1999).
People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. 1999). “The WIC Vendor Management Act also authorizes the Department to monitor the compliance of WIC vendors with federal and state laws and rules governing the WIC program, and to impose monetary penalties and sanctions for program violations.”
Crystal Food & Liquor, Inc. v. Howard Consultants, Inc., 658 N.E.2d 1279 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “” (410 ILCS 255/6 (West 1992).) The Act also directs the Department to "promulgate such rules as it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities under this Act and under relevant federal law and regulations.”
People v. Cervantes Dissent added February 1, 2000 (Ill. 1999). “410 ILCS 255/6 (West 1996). Attempting to explain the natural and logical connection between amendments made by Public Act 88–680 to the WIC Vendor Management Act and the subject of neighborhood safety, the State principally relies upon the appellate court’s decision in People v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|