Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 255/6 (2026)

Vendor compliance with law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 255/6) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 7556)
    Sec. 6. Vendor compliance with law.
    (a) The Department shall develop a system for monitoring the operations of all WIC retail food vendors to ensure compliance with federal and State laws and rules governing the WIC program.
    (b) The Department shall review the alleged violations of the federal and State laws and the rules promulgated thereunder.
    (c) The Department shall develop, by rule, a system of monetary penalties and other sanctions for any vendor, former vendor, individual, firm, corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, association, commercial enterprise, business entity, or legal entity determined to be in violation of this Act or program regulations. The level and severity of the sanctions shall be consistent with the type and frequency of violations, and may include, but shall not be limited to, suspension or termination from the program as well as monetary penalties.
(Source: P.A. 91-691, eff. 4-13-00.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–1999 · leading case: People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. 1999).
People v. Cervantes, 723 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. 1999). · cites it 4× “The WIC Vendor Management Act also authorizes the Department to monitor the compliance of WIC vendors with federal and state laws and rules governing the WIC program, and to impose monetary penalties and sanctions for program violations.”
Crystal Food & Liquor, Inc. v. Howard Consultants, Inc., 658 N.E.2d 1279 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “” (410 ILCS 255/6 (West 1992).) The Act also directs the Department to "promulgate such rules as it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities under this Act and under relevant federal law and regulations.”
People v. Cervantes Dissent added February 1, 2000 (Ill. 1999). · cites it 2× “410 ILCS 255/6 (West 1996). Attempting to explain the natural and logical connection between amendments made by Public Act 88–680 to the WIC Vendor Management Act and the subject of neighborhood safety, the State principally relies upon the appellate court’s decision in People v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.